User talk:Ottava Rima/Philosophy

Comments[edit]

I am finally getting to read over this page (sorry for the delay!). Overall, I believe these are the core editing guidelines that all users should be following, and I think if you follow those you will be fine. One point of contention - In general, I am not a believer in 0RR, as I think it can be difficult to define, difficult to follow, and in a worst case scenario can seriously hinder work on an article. What I would ask instead is a limit of 1 actual revert to good faith efforts (vandalism is an exception) and that you include a note on the article's talk page detailing why you chose to do so and inviting other opinions. Karanacs (talk) 15:45, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, its more of a "striving" towards not reverting. Plus, there are a lot of people who track obvious vandalism, so I don't need to worry too much about it. I only put it there because many of my blocks were for 2Rs or multiple 1Rs that caused problems. :) Ottava Rima (talk) 16:58, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Karanac's view of 0rr, its so thight that ulitmately it means nothing. I dont think you should be too tied to the reasons for previous blocks; they were snapshots of specific behavouir. You should take the spirit more than the letter. Ceoil ^sláinte 22:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]