User talk:Otto'sGottaSeeThat

April 2023[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Max Scherzer have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Max Scherzer was changed by Otto'sGottaSeeThat (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862675 on 2023-04-21T03:26:33+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Scott Boras have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Scott Boras was changed by Otto'sGottaSeeThat (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885737 on 2023-04-23T03:59:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Maurice Jones-Drew. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 04:58, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chase Utley, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Chase Utley was changed by Otto'sGottaSeeThat (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958195 on 2023-04-24T00:06:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:24, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:MinnesotaMethods per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MinnesotaMethods. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 14:13, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]