User talk:P64/Sandbox

Talk: Library of Congress Classification, annotated Contents 2012-05-11

Subpages. Bluelink sections pertain to the matter of subpages (of this article, such as an article on LC Class R) and comprise most of the discussion. Green sections may concern the same matter in effect, such as how subpages would be valuable to editors. (I don't understand the matters well enough to be sure.) Black sections (plain entries) certainly concern other matters, unrelated to subpages (some obsolete of course).

1 early discussion [green in part]
2 Wikipedia outline format
3 LoC Catalog Number

— — above this line entirely 2003 to 2005 — — now 2012-05-11

— — July 2006 to December 2007 — — now 2012-05-11

4 Using LC to organize category pages
5 Availability of the LOC classification system?
6 Criticism of LCC from the DDC Article
7 Classification articles nominated for deletion
8 All subsets of this page have been deleted.
9 Schedule B
10 Automatic addition of "class=FA"
11 sub pages

— — — December 2007 — — now 2012-05-11 there is no more recent material above this line

12 Pictures — unsigned 21:46, 29 September 2008‎ Raysonho
13 Deleting subpages — — 2009
14 Maintained how? — — October 2011
15 bullet
16 LCCN, LCSH, LC call number

TULIPS (Taiwan University cataloguing)[edit]

We say that Taiwan uses LCC but 2012-05-11 i find Witch Week classified by Dewey. [1]

Thruout my today revision of the article concerning LCCN, LCSH, and LC call numbers, I have maintained for illustration the first edition of Witch Week by Diana Wynne Jones (1982).

I did not quickly find it in the Australia catalogs. At the Taipei public library I did quickly find another British board school fiction --surprise, Charlie Bone rather than Harry Potter.