User talk:PN27

November 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nepalese royal massacre has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nepalese royal massacre was changed by PN27 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951144 on 2020-11-21T05:25:31+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 1951. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 06:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Which commentary? PN27 (talk) 06:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

The event refers to 1951 Nepalese revolution so I added new information

PN27 (talk) 06:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Elizium23 has used "Lack of neutrality"as an excuse to delete facts. PN27 (talk) 06:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Which is why you should take WP:NPOV more seriously. Further POV edits will also likely be removed. Toddst1 (talk) 15:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Direct, reliable sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct reliable sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without a reliable source as a reference are now being reverted on-sight.

Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 17:20, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Can you sincerely tell me which edit did I make violating wiki policy? PN27 (talk) 10:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Edit: September 25

Issues:

1. WP:DOYCITE
2. WP:BURDEN
3. WP:V

...

Toddst1 (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Other accounts

Kmishra1024, a brand new account, states on their userpage that they are the "mobile account" of you and Mo11vss. Is that true?--Bbb23 (talk) 12:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

No PN27 (talk) 14:42, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

One more question: is Mo11vss your account?--Bbb23 (talk) 15:29, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

You know what? You don't have to answer if you don't wish to, and I apologize for bothering you in the first place. It just goes to show that even an old pro can be bamboozled by a sock.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:51, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

I am a completeley different account than those account you mention PN27 (talk) 01:53, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kalapani territory. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 00:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Thats not a edit war. You could simply tell me that my edits ar wrong. I Have no treverted more than twice. PN27 (talk) 01:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hikmat Kumar Karki (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 2600:4040:4539:4100:15AB:60DC:527F:3F3D was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hikmat Kumar Karki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

2600:4040:4539:4100:15AB:60DC:527F:3F3D (talk) 15:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, PN27! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 2600:4040:4539:4100:15AB:60DC:527F:3F3D (talk) 15:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Kedar Karki cabinet

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kedar Karki cabinet, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC)