User talk:Paata Tsagareishvili

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sepia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sepia was changed by Paata Tsagareishvili (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961867 on 2015-08-15T15:48:27+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:48, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sepia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 10:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sepia, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sepia was changed by Paata Tsagareishvili (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854196 on 2015-08-17T10:29:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SEPIA (NGO)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SEPIA (NGO) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Mr X 14:52, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Meeting in Mountains

The article Meeting in Mountains has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, with no sources found during search. Tagged for notability for over 4 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]