User talk:Pafcool2/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Roy Hattersley

I have reverted your addition of Category:Daily Mail and General Trust to Roy Hattersley. There is nothing in the article to justify the category, and it seems implausible that he would have any involvement with the Daily Mail. Do you have a source which would justify placing him in the category? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I was adding the new category to pages, and I was adding all the links from the Daily Mail page Writers section here (see link for list). And the name of the person was there as well, and it also has a description " former Labour Party deputy leader". So I thought this was adequate (although I was suspicious that it was a Labour guy for a right wing paper). If i was wrong to add the category than i'm sorry.Pafcool2 16:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

See my reply at User talk:BrownHairedGirl#Roy_Hattersley. Have created a new a category which you should find useful. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

London Boroughs

Thanks for reviewing some of the London Boroughs pages, as you've noticed most are in a distressing state - and it's a good day when the page is extended from harmless to mostly harmless. I would however urge you to use the fact tag sparingly - either for things that don't make sense, or that are obviously disputed. I had a quick look round after you 'facted' London Borough of Barking and Dagenham and was quickly able to verify most of them from one source. If you had done the same, rather than leave it to me, we'd probably cut the work in half - but that's not to say you're wrong. They needed to be verified.

A bizarre example, which I noted you'd noticed is the London Borough of Tower Hamlets article. Somebody did a drive-by facting and reheading the page structure with stuff from the 'How to write about Geographical settlements' some time ago, they then didn't actually do any work on clearing up the mess they'd left - and, well, it left the page in a worse state than when they'd started. (They also did a lot of damage to other articles in Tower Hamlets, requesting facts all over the place, and marking it as 'lacking references'). You could consider marking pages {{refimprove}} as this indicates that the page, or section, needs further referencing, and is much less disruptive.

Editors are all volunteers, and have a very mixed standard of production. Most of the articles are deficient in any text, let alone referenced material - and setting standards too high does dissuade people from contributing. There's a balance to be achieved, and that should be encouragement, rather than an over enforcement of rules. Where you believe articles are deficient, please do take a moment to try to reference the material, rather than leave it to others. (I actually take a bizarre pleasure in doing that!).

Anyway, thanks for all your hard work. I wish all boroughs had reached the standard of London Borough of Croydon. On a number of occasions I've tried to persuade WPLondon to do a blitz on a borough of the month (article by article), ultimately, I think it's what's needed to improve the London coverage.

Cheers Kbthompson 20:33, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

A WikiProject you may be interested in...

Hi there! I notice you're from Surrey - please take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Surrey, which I started earlier this afternoon. Cheers.--Vox Humana 8' 20:02, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Earth like planet?

I read this about 55 Cancri f in the Daily Mail and wondered if this is new info. As i'm not really into science maybe you could field this! I've seen on the edit history that you are the only person to of added to the article See this article for me to see if i'm right, thanks! And please get back to me. From Pafcool2 20:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

You'd be better off asking Anarchist42. He authored the article;[1] I just rated it. --Turnipface 20:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh yeah! Sorry I was looking at another history page with your name on it, must of got them mixed up. My mistake! Pafcool2 20:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, a large moon orbiting the 4th planet could be habitable for life as we know it. Normally you'd expect a moon around a gas giant to be constantly bombarded with asteroids drawn in by the giant, which would be problematic for life, but in 55 Cancri there's an even larger giant further out that might help deflect them. And with the abundance of heavy elements in the system, there's a good chance a large terrestrial body would still be warm enough to keep plate tectonics going, which is needed to recycle water and air. One caveat, though: the moon would have to be huge, earth-sized, to retain a thick atmosphere. Titan has a thick atmosphere only because it's so cold; it would lose it if it were as warm as Earth. Our giants don't have any moons that large relative to the planet. And to be habitable, the moon would need to be outside the giant's radiation belts. Kwamikagami 20:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that answer, I didn't even know it's a moon from the article. You know you're science! Anyone else want to simplfy that? Pafcool2 20:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Dancing with the stars

The map has been modified with Sweden in it now. Best regards (you can modify it yourself in the future if there are other countries that have to be added). —Preceding unsigned comment added by LukaP (talk • contribs) 23:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:UK Tramcar Stock

Template:UK Tramcar Stock has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — David Arthur 22:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Well OK, since I didn't create it (i just made a few minor adjustments) but I'll put on my thoughts. -- Pafcool2 (talk) 16:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Strictly Come Dancing

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Strictly Come Dancing. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. The results for week seven on Strictly Come Dancing haven't been revealed yet (I'm watching it live) so please keep them off the page until they have. Thanks! ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 19:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, and it wasn't vandalism, I mean everyone knew that they were going out! There was no other possibility and you know that that's a fact! But sorry if you didn't want to know the results! Pafcool2 (talk) 19:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Once they were in the dance off, I knew that they would be going out. However, for verifiability purposes, the result should not be added until after it has happened. I thought I had selected the "factual error" template, but mustn't have - sorry about that. However, in future, please keep the result off until after it has been broadcast live. Thanks :) ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 19:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Radio station

Done. --Marknew (talk) 13:15, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Also, 'i' should be 'I'! :) Thanks. Tiddly-Tom 07:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Template:UK Hotels

This is a very bad idea. First most of these companies are not based in the UK. Second the only logical follow on is create a template for every country in which case there would be scores of these templates in most hotel company articles. That would make these next to useless. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:06, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

East Croydon

Hey, I can't work out what you did with the infobox here but it appears to have removed half the parameters, just thought I'd let you know. Cheers, - Zeibura ^(Talk) 21:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Me niether, I was hoping someone else would know what to do! Pafcool2 (talk) 13:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

I found the solution. One of the ref tags was missing the >. Simply south (talk) 13:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:UK light rail

Template:UK light rail has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — David Arthur (talk) 23:29, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Template:Bus companies in Greater London

I got the idea for Template:Bus companies in North West England from Template:Bus companies in Wales - but it seemed sensible to sub-categorise by county as otherwise it would be a bit of an amorphous blob. I opted to go for "Major bus companies" only to stop every Tom, Dick and Harry from being added, although there are still a few entries in there which I disapprove of! I'm not quite sure how you define the various areas of London, as it seemingly can't be done on county lines - perhaps boroughs? It certainly would be good to roll out across the rest of England, it's just finding the time to sit down and do it. I'd probably start with North East, Yorkshire and West Midlands, so if you wanted to do some, perhaps East and South East would be a good place to start? Divy (talk) 10:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

A combination of prior knowledge of the main operating groups and large independents cross-referenced against the existing articles in Category:Current bus operators in England. County council websites can be useful places to look too. Divy (talk) 14:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:UK Food

Template:UK Food has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Vegaswikian (talk) 20:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Template:UK light rail

Hi, i've put this up for merger with Template:Britishmetros. See the template talk page. I will also raise this on WP:Rail, WP:TIS and WP:LT. Simply south (talk) 15:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I may overhaul it and restore Britishmetros. Simply south (talk) 12:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Motorway services templates

I like what you have done with the templates for Moto Roadchef and Welcome Break, but believe strongly that they don't belong on the articles of the individual franchisers e.g. Costa, McDonalds, WH Smith etc. I have therefore removed them. --Cheesy Mike (talk) 17:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

I do think it is reasonable to mention Moto, Roadchef or Welcome Break within each company's article and provide a wikilink, but the template really is overkill. --Cheesy Mike (talk) 17:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Map for East Midlands Trains

East Midlands Trains is a complicated franchise, so it would be harder to map than most of the ones I’ve done (I don’t like to just copy the official map), but I have thought about doing it; at the moment I’m struggling with Ottawa’s buses and Copenhagen’s S-tog network. What do you think would be more useful — a schematic map, or a geographical one? David Arthur (talk) 15:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

London Meetup - January 12, 2008

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over at Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 03:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

BotHell

Every time this bot is allowed to run it creates problems for everyone (including me!). I nearly blocked it this evening, but someone beat me to it - that's how bad it is. If you add {{Non-free use rationale}} and provide a rationale for each page that the image is used in, that seems to satisfy the beast - until someone comes up with a better idea to make all our lives hell! Good luck. Kbthompson (talk) 00:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

DYK Nom

Hi. I've nominated No.1 Croydon, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on March 14, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks, Mjroots (talk) 03:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On 20 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 50p Building, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 08:56, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Images of Croydon

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Images of Croydon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Images of Croydon. ninety:one 16:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files ;) ninety:one 16:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

obviously it's not up to me, but the fact is that they should all be at wikimedia commons, not here. i will nominate manchester as well. ninety:one 16:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Images of Croydon

An editor has nominated Images of Croydon, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Images of Croydon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Commons

Creating links from the Commons back here is a bit more trouble than creating them here. What I miss is the redlinks that warn you about typos. But if you have a big Commons edit session you can copy the text to any Wikipedia edit box and preview it. For example the wikitext of these two links: Norbury Norberry will work here or on the Commons. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 21:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

(The) Mail on Sunday

I have restored the italics in this article which you mysteriously removed and have taken it upon myself to add notification to Wikipedia:Requested moves‎ on the article's title. Cheers Philip Cross (talk) 17:47, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

London Meetups - Sunday May 11th

We're hoping to have regular meetups in London. The next one is on May 11th Wikipedia:Meetup/London 9. Another Sunday lunch in Holborn. Come along! -- Harry Wood (talk) 11:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Sheffield in the "Local travel" section of London Borough of Croydon article

Hi Pafcool2, just to clarify this. I just noticed in the section "Local travel" this reference: "The North Downs, an area of outstanding natural beauty popular with both on- and off-road cyclists, is so close to Sheffield that part of the park lies within the city boundary"... Forgive my ignorance, but am I right in that I think you mean Sheffield Park Garden? I have linked to there for the time being. If I am on the wrong track here, perhaps you'd like to fix the correct link. As it was, it didn't seem to make it clear disconcertingly what Sheffield was meant and wasn't linked to anything. Many thanks. Dieter Simon (talk) 22:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Croydoncouncillogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Croydoncouncillogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:44769346 paulince index226.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:44769346 paulince index226.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

North End

Thanks, I take your point about the North End article, I wasn't sure of the policy on commercial material and I was hoping that someone would either agree with me and delete the relevant section or else disagree with me and delete my comment. Ehrenkater (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Nice work!

Although the influence from the List of tallest buildings and structures in Salford is clear, I love your work on the List of tallest buildings and structures in Croydon - I think it's a great article and its nice to see that at least someone read the Salford one! Well done, :) --Jza84 |  Talk  02:03, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello, regarding your addition to WP:UKCITIES today, can you please outline your rationale on the UKCITIES talk page as to why you added this? That isn't a challenge as such, it's just there is a notice on that guideline that additions should have consensual approval first following a proposal, really. I'm concerned that additions without approval will lead to conflict on a well established guideline. --Jza84 |  Talk  19:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Croydon tower.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Croydon tower.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:35, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kent_Exiles.gif

I have tagged Image:Kent_Exiles.gif as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Melesse (talk) 20:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:4211.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:4211.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Invitation to Wikipedia meetup in London

Wikimedia UK logo

Date: 13:00 onwards, Sunday 10 August 2008

Venue: Penderel's Oak pub, Holborn WC1 map

More information: Wikipedia:Meetup/London 12

Hello,

I noticed that you have listed yourself as a Wikipedian in London, so I thought you might like to come to one of our monthly social meetups. The next one is going to be on Sunday 10 August, which might well be rather short notice, but if you can't come this time, we try to have one every second Sunday of the month.

If you haven't been before, these meetups are mainly casual social events for Wikipedia enthusiasts in which we chat about Wikipedia and any other topics we fancy. It's a great way to meet some very keen Wikipedians, but we'd also love for you to come along if you're interested in finding out more about Wikipedia, other Wikimedia projects, or other collaborative wiki projects too.

The location is a pub that is quite quiet and family friendly on a Sunday lunchtime, so hopefully younger Wikipedians will also feel welcome and safe. Alcohol consumption is certainly not required!

Although the meetups are popular, many UK-based editors still don't know about them. It would be great to welcome some fresh faces, so I hope you can come along.

Yours,

James F. (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Please forgive the slightly impersonal mass-invite!

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 20:26, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Title hillsyde.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Title hillsyde.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Table Table logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Table Table logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Megatrainlogo2.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Megatrainlogo2.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:This is Money.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:This is Money.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 14:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Culture pic.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Culture pic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Mail Online.gif)

You've uploaded File:Mail Online.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Hopwood Park services

Hi Pafcool2/Archive 2! An article you have been involved with has been tagged by its parent project as needing a little attention or further development. If you can help with these minor issues please see talk:Hopwood Park services. --Kudpung (talk) 10:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:ITunes Festival 2010 Ellie Goulding.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ITunes Festival 2010 Ellie Goulding.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2