User talk:PalmTreesCoolBreeze

Your submission at Articles for creation: Audic Empire (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Audic Empire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 00:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, PalmTreesCoolBreeze! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 00:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Audic Empire (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Audic Empire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Audric Empire

Hello Dan! I updated and added some new citations/references. #1 and #2 are from a California-based music magazine and #10 is from ABC television affiliate KVUE. I'm hoping these can be considered reliable sources so the article can be accepted. Thank you for any input and help you can provide! PalmTreesCoolBreeze (talk) 16:06, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi PalmTreesCoolBreeze, at the moment the article is struggling to meet the requirements of WP:NMUSIC. To start with a lot of the information in the article is original research, as it has no inline citations referencing reliable secondary sources. All the information in the article needs to have references as to where that information came from.

In respect to the references you have cited I will go through them one by one:

1. Top Shelf Music website is questionable, as it doesn't provide any details of the editorial oversight. It is hard to say what position, Kristy Rose, has at the organization (i.e. is she a staff member or a private individual) and whether anyone has vetted her submission before it was published.
2. as above
3. podcasts are generally not considered as independent or reliable.
4. Concert Archives.com is user generated without any independent editorial oversight - therefore unreliable and not an acceptable source
5. Spotify is not an acceptable source, and in this case as its an interview with the band it is a primary source and not independent or reliable.
6. The OC Weekly reference talks all about Opie Ortiz but there is nothing that refers to his work with Audric Empire
7. The same applies with the U Discover Music website.
8. The New Music Friday website is just a link to Spotify, which isn't an acceptable source - there is no coverage of the band
9. YouTube is not an acceptable or reliable source
10. KVUE (ABC) is essentially an interview with the band, which is a primary source and not independent or reliable.
11. YouTube is not an acceptable or reliable source

Even if Top Shelf Music was determined to be an acceptable source, it would need to be supported by other reliable sources. As per S0091's suggestion you need to check out WP:WikiProject Albums/Sources for an idea of what are acceptable sources. I hope that gives you some idea as to why the draft article has been declined. If you are able to find additional reliable secondary sources to establish the band's notability then drop me a line on my talk page and I'll re-assess the draft for you. Dan arndt (talk) 05:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Audic Empire

Hello, PalmTreesCoolBreeze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Audic Empire, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)