User talk:Pankajunk

Hyperoffice[edit]

It read like a company history written by the public relations department, with no sourcing of substance. The "plucky little company struggles against the big guys" storyline was so strong as to obscure whatever substance was there. I'd advise you to create a new clean version in a sandbox, then ask a few editors to take a look at it and consider posting it to article space. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no non-spam version. I could, however, restore a copy of the last spammy version to your userspace (perhaps as User:Pankajunk/Hyperoffice) (we call that "userfying") for you to work on. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See User:Pankajunk/HyperOffice. --Orange Mike | Talk 12:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did some quick copyediting to the article at User:Pankajunk/HyperOffice. It's not perfect, but it seems good enough to put into the main article namespace. TheCoffee (talk) 17:17, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned it up a bit too. Rich Farmbrough, 18:21 23 April 2009 (UTC).

I'm not sure you quite understand how Wikipedia works. You don't need to ask me to remove the flag, you can just go ahead and remove it. If someone adds it back, talk to them. Andrevan@ 22:29, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dated cleanup tags

Hi, thanks for your message, SmackBot does not generally add tags, but merely dates those that are already there. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 15:19, 22 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]