User talk:Pantherslair

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Odyssey 5[edit]

Although it is admirable that you share such a passion for this show, you are going about it the wrong way to bring attention to it by seeking to put an entry into Wikipedia about it. Everytime you do it, your edit will be reverted. If you continue to add it in, you will eventually be blocked for edit warring. Wikipedia is not a site for advocacy. If the petition managed to gain some sort of widespread mainstream coverage it would be considered worthy of inclusion into the article. As it stands, it is completely not notable and regardless of how passionate you or the other "thousands upon thousands of die hard fans all over the world" are about the show, it does not merit an entry into the article. This is unfortunately the way of Wikipedia's policies. This is not about lack of "compassion" or "heart" as no editor has anything against the show, but it is the requirement of all editors on Wikipedia to follow its policies and guidelines. I highly recommend that you read the links that I have added above. Should you continue to edit war the inclusion of the link into the article, you will be blocked. Please consider this a friendly warning and not a threat as I am not an administrator and do not possess the privileges to impose a block, but any editor may request that an admin review your edits and if you are determined to be edit warring, the block will be levied. Blackmane (talk) 14:59, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stuart Rudd (musician) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stuart Rudd (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Rudd (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 23:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: STEREO 10 (August 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:22, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Pantherslair! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:22, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Pantherslair. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. This is regarding STEREO 10. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

Information icon

Hello Pantherslair. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Pantherslair. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pantherslair|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stereo 10 Brisbane[edit]

Information icon Hello, Pantherslair. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stereo 10 Brisbane, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stereo 10 Brisbane[edit]

Hello, Pantherslair. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stereo 10 Brisbane".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]