User talk:Parisgirl89

Paid editing[edit]

Hi. Just a friendly tip: even if your paid editing is declared within policy, it is hardly likely that any volunteers will be ready to help you with your article. See WP:BOGOF by Widefox. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:39, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:S S Mantha ‎[edit]

I'm one of the editors herewho works most on bios of scientists. I've taken a look at it. It's a promotionally written article of a notable person. As Kudpung says, I am not really inclined to devote my efforts as a volunteer towards improving an article for which someone else is going to be paid money. The only suggestion I can make to you is that before you try to write here for money you learn to write here properly, which you can do best by working on articles of personal interest.

But I also have to ask you, have you written any articles here under any other user names? DGG ( talk ) 00:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DGGThanks so much for the comments and the pointers as to how to edit the page better. I have never written any article before this on Wikipedia in my life. And I had to make that declaration of paid editor to ensure my page doesn't get tagged as a sock or deleted - which another 'sock' was bullying me into. That account has apparently now been reported and banned indefinitely - ninjaeditor.

I can assure you I am not getting paid in any form to write or edit this page. I'll keep your comments in mind, it is great! I've tried editing the article again, please do help me refine it better!Parisgirl89 (talk) 08:51, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: S S Mantha (May 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject is notable, but the article is not written in the normal style of a Wikipedia article, and shows rather the style of a (declared) paid editor more used towriting other forms of promotionalism .

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:S S Mantha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:S S Mantha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 00:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: S S Mantha (June 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KartikeyaS343 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article still needs to be edited to comply with the guidelines and the awards need referencing as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:S S Mantha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:S S Mantha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KartikeyaS (talk) 07:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Parisgirl89! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KartikeyaS (talk) 07:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DEVEGOWDA S R was:

The subject is notable, but the article is not written in the normal style of a Wikipedia article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DEVEGOWDA S R (talk) 04:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:S. S. Mantha[edit]

Hello, Parisgirl89. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:S. S. Mantha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:S. S. Mantha[edit]

Hello, Parisgirl89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "S. S. Mantha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]