User talk:Parsa Dalili

Welcome!

Hello, Parsa Dalili, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Parsa Dalili, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Parsa Dalili

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Parsa Dalili requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm Rsk6400. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Austrians, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rsk6400 (talk) 20:12, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Germans, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Less than 48 hours ago I had to remind you of our rules for referencing. Please be sure you look at them carefully. Rsk6400 (talk) 14:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, you can answer me here or on my own talk page, but to use the thank-you-feature of WP is not a good idea, because I don't know whether you are serious or want to use irony. --Rsk6400 (talk) 16:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Worldometer

Hello. I saw that you updated population figures for Sinhalese people, but somebody has reverted your changes. Examining them, I can see two reasons that you should be aware of:

Though you mentioned your source in your edit summary, you left the citation of the original source in the article. If a citation is in the article, that information being given needs to be verifiable from that source. If you want to replace outdated information based on a newer source, you actually need to replace the citation of the older source with a citation of the newer one.
Worldometer is considered an unreliable source and should probably never be relied on for anything. See WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Worldometer for an explanation.

I see that other editors have been reverting your similar changes to a number of other articles for a while. These are equally likely the reasons for those reversions. Largoplazo (talk) 10:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Gee11228, you may be blocked from editing. Largoplazo (talk) 16:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Icelanders. TylerBurden (talk) 10:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 20:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]