User talk:Pascal.Tesson/Archive 20
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Pascal.Tesson. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 |
User 5
Please restore the article you deleted on "The Strangest Secret" on December 11. You marked this as spam, but I am looking for information on it. You probably don't know this, but it's a historical work and deserves to be in Wikipedia.
Thanks, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.16.237.114 (talk) 18:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- Historical work or not, the article was nothing but spam. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Dear Pascal,
An article you deleted on 13 October 2007 (CSD A7), Brian Nixon, is back up again, as unnotable as it probably was the first time around. Thanks for your attention, Drmies (talk) 02:10, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- meh... I think you should take it to AfD: there appears to be a few relevant sources though their quality seems questionable. But it should be debated. I recommend removing the prod tag and sending it to AfD. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 03:47, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Disney Game HSM 3 Sing it
You have deleted an article on a video game called Disney Sing It: High School Musical 3 Senior Year
Why was this and could you please get it running again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.5.97.55 (talk) 13:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- It was deleted because the content was a copyright violation. It can be recreated as long as the copyright issue is resolved. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 15:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
OK Thanyou for replying —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.5.97.55 (talk) 09:10, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Latest Lyle123 socks
Hi, Pascal. Our little friend in Oz has been back for two socks and two matching hoaxes in the last two days. They are User:ThopicMovie200955555 and User:AManNamedFred19677777. One IP which vandalized an existing article based on the first sock was User:121.44.27.31. You'll see on my talk page that the IP may be too large for a range block, but if no other edits are coming from it, I think that a range block and a possible formal complaint to the IP are more than warranted. Whatcha think? --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
One more just popped up: User:Trickykoala195788888. At least he's consistent. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Add to the list User:ManteeTheatresMovie19947777 User:Highschoolmusical10102 User:AliveDeaths19675555 Skier Dude (talk) 07:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
IMDB copyright violations
I disagree on two counts. First, copyright violations are supposed to be expunged, especially if caught early. Two, if the copyright violations are removed, what's left are NOT 'perfectly acceptable stubs', they're essentially empty directory listings, without the slightest hint of why the subject is worth writing about to begin with, let alone any evidence thereto. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 21:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
HELP!!!
Somebody blanked my page and I cannot undo it! Please help. My user page is here. HELP ME!!!!
Non-free images
Just saw your comments on Seraphimblade's talk page and wanted to thank you for your input. My understanding of an article is not increased by the logos in question either, but many in WikiProject Television Stations believe that it does enhance their understanding, which is why I take up the cause. It frustrates me that a small band of editors, most of whom I believe to also be administrators, take such a heavy-handed approach to enforcing their rigid interpretation of policy and guideline, instead of enforcing the policy as written. I firmly believe that the intended current use of historical images is compliant with policy, and am trying to encourage the project to bring non-compliant images into compliance, rather than deleting them. It's been an uphill battle both ways for me, both with those who want the non-free images gone, and those who don't understand that Wikipedia policy is intentionally stricter than the law requires. Further adding to my frustration is that the more I've read copyright law, the more I'm convinced that many of the pre-1989 logos and script-based logos are, in fact, public domain, but those opposed to non-free images refuse to believe that they are, especially when the definition of public domain in policy statements is strictly pre-1923. dhett (talk • contribs) 00:00, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- For the record, I'm all for a very strict enforcement of the policy. That includes calling out editors who claim that they find that an old logo significantly enhances their understanding of an article about a television station. I think Seraphimblade is often arguing for enforcing what he things the policy should be rather than what it is. But it is equally true that the policy is far stricter than what is legally permitted under fair use law and editors who fail to recognize this are equally guilty of fostering the constant bickering. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 04:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Pascal,
May I have the page moved to my UserPage for further review.
"NUS_Master_of_Computing_ITPM_(IT_Project_Management)"
This page was constructed to provide more details on the ITPM (Masters Project Management Program)
Hi Pascal,
May I have the page moved to my UserPage for further review.
"NUS_Master_of_Computing_ITPM_(IT_Project_Management)"
This page was constructed to provide more details on the ITPM (Masters Project Management Program)
(Vijayjva (talk) 13:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC))
User talk:Vijayjva/NUS draft.
Hi Pascal,
Help me to correct the issues, what are stuffs you feel it to be as advert.
(Vijayjva (talk) 00:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC))
request for third opinion
Hi, I and my fellow editors are facing a deadlock on a issue of removing/toning down a section on 'allegation of cruelty' as subsection under 'criticism' section in Operation Blue Star article, concerns include WP:NPOV, the summary of dispute can be found at [1], please let us know your views/opinion at the talk page of the article so that 'alleged' bias may be looked into and a consensual solution may be found. Thanks LegalEagle (talk) 07:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
hey why did you delete 'Pangarap ko ang Ibigin Ka' article on wikipedia?
Did this URL (http://byxbuzz.blogspot.com/2008/10/lead-stars-of-abs-cbns-koreanovela.html) or blog violate copyrights?
this is what i found when i searched for 'Pangarap Ko Ang Ibigin Ka'
15:20, 15 November 2008 Pascal.Tesson (Talk | contribs) deleted "Pangarap Ko Ang Ibigin Ka" (Copyright violation of http://byxbuzz.blogspot.com/2008/10/lead-stars-of-abs-cbns-koreanovela.html (CSD G12))
email me at whendogsaysmeow@yahoo.co,uk
List of ships captured by Somali pirates
Note that it was tagged (aggressively) for speed deletion. I removed that and tagged the article as in construction until you can make the table look, well, like an actual table! Cheers, Pascal.Tesson (talk) 22:18, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Ah nevermind, I see that you're already on it. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 22:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oh thanks. This will take some time as the information does not seem to be organized anywhere. I welcome any help. :) -- Cat chi? 22:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, I've just noticed that there's already a table in the article Piracy in Somalia. It may or may not be complete but it seems to be thoroughly referenced. So it's not clear that List of ships captured by Somali pirates is really needed, unless you decide to spin-off the existing table in Piracy in Somalia. I would also suggest that the title be changed to something along the lines of "ships captured by pirates off the coast of Somalia" (as it's often unclear who the pirates are, especially if one goes up the hierarchy). Pascal.Tesson (talk) 22:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- I renamed the page as you requested. I also moved some of the contents of the list on Piracy in Somalia. Feel free to take a look. -- Cat chi? 03:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, I've just noticed that there's already a table in the article Piracy in Somalia. It may or may not be complete but it seems to be thoroughly referenced. So it's not clear that List of ships captured by Somali pirates is really needed, unless you decide to spin-off the existing table in Piracy in Somalia. I would also suggest that the title be changed to something along the lines of "ships captured by pirates off the coast of Somalia" (as it's often unclear who the pirates are, especially if one goes up the hierarchy). Pascal.Tesson (talk) 22:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oh thanks. This will take some time as the information does not seem to be organized anywhere. I welcome any help. :) -- Cat chi? 22:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- How can you aggressively Tag something LOL. Ponty Pirate (talk)
ALL THE SAME WIKIPEDIA IS NOT F0R ME PLEASE JUST CLOSE MY ACCOUNT. Ponty Pirate (talk) 23:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Bangladesh guitarist
Heya, on Ershad(guitarist), I was checking the other bands, and they really do exist. I was about to decline the speedy but leave the prod tag in place. Up to you if you want to undelete, but I did want to let you know. --Elonka 17:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Gerald Thomas (Playwright & Director)
Hello Pascal,
Earlier today you deleted my posting of Gerald Thomas' biography at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Thomas_(playwright_%26_director) I had posted it there from a request from Gerald himself to please do so because other existing pages on him are inaccurate. He asked me to use his official bio. Since that bio consists of facts and not opinions it's hard to rewrite and why do so? I am Patrick Grant, one of his friends and collaborators and a WIKI user. I can be seen listed as one of his favorite links on his official Blog if that helps in terms of verification at: http://colunistas.ig.com.br/geraldthomas/ Please advise. Pgrizzy (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Gerald Thomas & copyright
Hello Patrick. Thanks for asking questions rather than turning away in frustration. There are a couple of issues at play here. The first one of course is the copyright issue which led to the article's deletion. I'm not questioning your assertions that this was made upon Gerald Thomas' request but copyrights are something we try to be very careful about. So we usually require that the authorization to use material from other websites is confirmed through the Open-source Ticket Request System. In particular, releasing the material on Wikipedia implies a couple of things that you or Gerald Thomas may not be comfortable with. First, the release of the material under a GFDL compatible license cannot be restricted to Wikipedia: this means that anyone can henceforth use the material in any way they see fit. Secondly, the article on Wikipedia may not (in fact most certainly will not) remain in the state in which you created it. Others are free to edit it as they see fit (provided of course that changes are meaningful). The other important issues are related to conflict of interest and neutrality. Because you're a close friend of Gerald Thomas, it's reasonable to question your objectivity about him. This doesn't mean that you're in any way forbidden to write about him but it does mean that you'll face more scrutiny. I have to agree that the bio on the website is not a piece of glorification but it still has a problematic overall tone. Among other things, sentences like "Brazil had never seen such an effervescent uproar" need to go, references to other things on Thomas' website (e.g. "(see the New York Times press clipping of 11 November 2003 under "press")" have to be removed and the long long lists of projects make the article look like a resumé. The content should also be sourced through reliable third-party coverage. So while I have no objection to an article about Gerald Thomas, the text you proposed is not acceptable as is. Let me know if you have any further questions. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson (talk) 14:05, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Pascal,
OK then, I'll try posting it again and stripping it down to as bare boned as possible. The reason why Gerald asked me to do this in the first place is, besides the fact that I'm a bit more internet savvy than he, because WIKI has other posts about him that contain erroneous or incomplete information, a lot of it in other languages, and he simply wanted to create a reliable source of info on WIKI that he could send inquiries to instead of having to answer in detail every one. I myself am short on time too and simply wish to do this favor for him and move onto other things. Plus we wonder how his other friends and colleagues seem to be able to update their WIKI pages themselves without this kind of scrutiny. Anyway, I'll remove all adjectives that come from press quotes and streamline the quantity and descriptions of his voluminous output and cross our fingers that it can can remain as an entry. Thanks, Patrick Grant Pgrizzy (talk) 20:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear Pascal,
Thank you, thank you, thank you for taking this kind of time. I have re-posted a cursory article about Gerald (i.e. the simplest bio possible that leads up to the formation of his company and a list of works and performance dates in reverse chronological order, I did the latter because entries for bands list their albums). I created links to his Official Web Site (yes, it's sassy) and his Blog (even sassier) with the most recent of interviews that fills in a lot of biographical detail. Hopefully, this entry (and I still want to clean it up some) will serve as an accurate point of departure should anybody try to find Gerald through WIKI. And even more hopefully, it won't get taken down without warning, I hope, I hope. Your response has been stellar and I thank you. Please let me know if there is anything beyond what I've said that could be cleared up but I hope that you feel that you've gotten us on a good tract here and can set your sights on other entries that need clarification. All my best, Patrick Grant Pgrizzy (talk) 00:38, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
P.S. The URL for that entry is at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Thomas_(playwright_%26_director) Pgrizzy (talk) 00:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear Pascal,
We totally agree with you and are doing our best to clean it up. I did add the category of "Dramatists and playwrights" because, when this whole thing started, Gerald didn't feel it accurate that he was listed solely as an interpreter of other people's work. Also, he was born in New York City, not Brazil. That has always been a bit of a mystery to the public but since we have to be accurate, that is the fact. I removed the "highly questionable" comment in regards to Philip Glass but there are many pages on the internet regarding their piece "Mattogrosso" I'm not sure what more needs to be said. As far as other works, like those with Heiner Mueller, should I post a link to productions at La MaMa E.T.C. from the 80s that show this? As far as the formation of his Dry Opera Compnay, we thought that the extensive performance history listed in the works below would cover that. Also, there's so many links regarding this company on the web, where to start? As far as the Peter Brooks and Victor Garcia comments, it is agreed that they belong in an autobiography rather than WIKI because they are memoirs in quality and not quantifiable. Thanks again, it's evolving, slowly but surely. P.S. - Gerald says that if you dispute his place of birth, he can back it up to you personally if it comes down to that. -Patrick Pgrizzy (talk) 17:23, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
You delete 'Chinred Spirits / Vicky Gets Fired!'!
I am so mad at you, I worked hard on this so, do not deleted!
You big silly nincompoop! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcellusb (talk • contribs) 22:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Re. Your kid brother...
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Arb Com elections
Hey, just wondering if you realised you voted for and against the same candidate in a matter of 5 minutes. Was it supposed to go to someone else? [2] and [3]. —Borgardetalk 08:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Wizardman
According to this, you voted support and oppose. Which is it? Viriditas (talk) 08:06, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your careful consideration at my successful RfA. Please let me know on my talk page if you have any suggestions for me. - Dan Dank55 (send/receive) 20:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Drag pageantry"
Just curious about your reasoning behind speedily deleting Drag pageantry? You accepted a speedy request on an article that was over two years old, had a history of 90 plus edits from a wide variety of editors that was 26k long. Furthermore, the DB tag had been placed by an IP editor. Why? -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 16:44, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Ah hah! Mine is not the only admin incompetence on the project! I new it! =D
- Thanks - I appreciate restoring it. It's not a great article, but it deserves to get better (IMO). =D -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 04:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Grant Wood
I appreciate your comments at Talk:Grant Wood, we have been engaged at the Visual Arts project for weeks about the issue of images in articles, and I started a new thread here [4]. If you scroll up from there you'll see the long conversations about this issue - having to do with works of art that need to be seen in order to be appreciated properly...Thanks for you input...Modernist (talk) 20:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Greetings. I saw you erased my new article as I have requested, to tempt the faith described in the content of the book. I've recreated the article, please have a look. very interesting book.--Procrastinating@talk2me 16:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
RfA thankspam
|
|
Special thanks go out to Wizardman and Malinaccier for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for the trust the community has placed in me. A special Christmas song for you all can be found at the right hand side of this message! Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Dendodge TalkContribs, 17:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC) |
YOU ARE CONTINUOUSLY DELETING MY PAGE ON THE TEMPESTS, BUT YOU ALLOW OTHER BAND'S PAGES TO BE PRESENT. IT IS NOT BLATANT ADVERTISING, ANYMORE THAN WHAT THE OTHER PAGES HAVE DONE. IT IS A HISTORICAL DOCUMENTATION ON GARAGE BANDS OF THE SIXTIES AND ONE IN PARTICULAR. I HAVE READ AND READ THE GUIDELINES AND YOU ARE WRONG. I THOUGHT WIKIPEDIA WAS A CLAS SITE. BUT YOUR BLATANT ATTACKS ON MY ATTEMPT TO WRITE FACTUAL HISTORY THAT IS ALSO APPEALING TO OTHER READERS IS DISCRIMINATING, UNLESS YOU REMOVE EVERY ROCK AND ROLL BAND SITE FROM WIKIPEDIA. MICROV —Preceding unsigned comment added by Microv (talk • contribs) 16:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Bitgle
Dear Pascal.Tesson, you have deleted the new stub Bitgle because you considered it was spam, but it is a serious web engine, just like Torrentz or YouTorrent, also the wikipages are similar.
I hope that you can put it back ASAP!
Looking forward to reading from you. --Torrentler (talk) 17:06, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Pascal, I understand and respect your opinion, but you have to admit that your decision is at least unfair because the others articles that I have cited before have the same characteristics and despite that they're still there... Best regards, --Torrentler (talk) 21:20, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Pascal, could you please remove the www.bitgle.com from the spam blacklist? Thanks and merry Xmas! Best, --Torrentler (talk) 21:35, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. You should take this up with the people who manage the spam blacklist on meta:Talk:Spam blacklist. They will be able to explain why the site was blacklisted: this is usually the result of an excessive number of external links added and re-added even though the site, which has just been launched, is insignificant. Best, Pascal.Tesson (talk) 20:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
The Collins College of Hospitality Management page deletion
Pascal.Tesson,
Why have you deleted The Collins College of Hospitality Management page? The college is a legitimate program at Cal Poly Pomona university. Most of the colleges have Wikipedia pages at the university. If there is an issue with the content, I'd appreciate suggestions on how to change the content - rather than a complete and unexpected deleation.
I have started this page and sent an e-mail to the entire faculty and staff where I work encouraging them to edit and change as they see fit. I understand and respect the democratic sharing of information on Wikipedia and I am simply getting a page started, which I expect and hope people will contribute to. Please reverse the deletion.
Best, Lisa McPheron lcmcpheron@csupomona.edu
Lcmcpheron (talk) 02:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Lyle 123 again
Couple more:
Ciao- Skier Dude (talk) 03:49, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Pascal.Tesson (talk) 20:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Snaffled some more on the talk page. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:43, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Pascal.Tesson (talk) 20:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
The Collins College page
Pascal.Tesson, Thank you for the insights into tone and for not deleting the page again. I want this page to be successful and an additional source of information about the college.
The full name of the college includes "The." How would I add that to the name of the page?
Thanks, Lisa —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lcmcpheron (talk • contribs) 21:47, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
The Collins College page name
Pascal.Tesson,
Thank you. The "The" always causes issues.
Happy Holidays, Lisa —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lcmcpheron (talk • contribs) 23:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
United Israel Appeal, Inc.
There was nio copyright violation. United Israel Appeal, Inc, is a wholly owned subsidiary of United Jewish Communities. Please restore the page. Associated typer (talk) 20:00, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
Adjusters International
I believe that the section called "Notable Achievements" is important because it shows the legitimacy of the company, especially that they were called in after 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombing. I believe that the "Publications" section is important because these two publications set the industry standard. The publications are written to be very impartial and they are not self-serving to Adjusters International. I hope that you will agree with me. Thank you for taking the time to discuss this with me.Kandi111777 (talk) 18:19, 30 December 2008 (UTC)