User talk:PastorPeitl2022

Welcome![edit]

Hello, PastorPeitl2022!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 07:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OM-Pastor Hans-Georg Peitl (May 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OM-Pastor Hans-Georg Peitl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OM-Pastor Hans-Georg Peitl, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eigentlich hätte ich erwartet, dass Amazon, weltbild, thalia, ebook, etc. ja nicht meine Arbeitsbereiche sind, als Zeugen ausreichen:

Um nur einmal ein paar anzuzeigen.

Wie weit geht es Euch eigentlich um Objektivität und wie weit nur darum, irgendeinen mit Hass gefüllten Menschen bei der Rache, wofür weiss ich übrigens noch nicht einmal so genau, zu unterstützen? PastorPeitl2022 (talk) 08:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PastorPeitl2022! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eigentlich hätte ich erwartet, dass Amazon, weltbild, thalia, ebook, etc. ja nicht meine Arbeitsbereiche sind, als Zeugen ausreichen:

https://www.amazon.de/s?k=Hans-Georg+Peitl&__mk_de_DE=%C3%85M%C3%85%C5%BD%C3%95%C3%91&crid=20FW9MBJGUZUM&sprefix=hans-georg+%2Caps%2C115&ref =nb_sb_noss_2

https://www.buecher.de/ni/search_search/quick_search/q/cXVlcnk9SGFucytHZW9yZytQZWl0bCZyZXN1bHRzPTE1/receiver_object/shop_search_quicksearch/

https://www.thalia.de/suche?sq=Hans-Georg+Peitl

https://www.weltbild.de/suche/Hans-Georg%20Peitl

https://www.eurobuch.com/buch/isbn/3748547587.html?doAbeDe=1&doAchtungBuecher=1&doAgapea=1&doAlibrisUK=1&doAmazon=1&doAmazonUk=1&doAntikbuch24=1&doAudible=1&doAudiobooks=1&doBetterworld=1&doBiblioUK=1&doBlackwell=1&doBookOutlet=1&doBookdepository=1&doBooklooker=1&doBooksamillion= 1&doBruna=1&doBuchfreund=1&doBuecherDe=1&doCalendars=1&doDodaxCh=1&doDodaxDe=1&doEBay=1&doEBayDE=1&doEbooks=1&doEbookscom=1&doFoyles=1&doHive=1&doHugendubel=1&doIbs=1&doImosver=1&doIndigo=1&doKobo=1&doLaFeltrinelli=1&doLehmanns=1&doLibreriauniversitaria=1&doLibriEB=1&doLivrenpoche=1&doMedimops=1&doMomoxshop=1&doMorawa= 1&doMusicnotes=1&doNotenbuch=1&doOrellfuessli=1&doPerlego=1&doPriceminister=1&doProlibri=1&doRebuy=1&doRoutledge=1&doScholastic=1&doThaliaDe=1&doWaterstones=1&doWeltbildDe=1&doWordery=1&doZVAB=1&mediatypeSelect=0&noBids=0&noReprint=0&pageLen=20&sCountry=DE&search=Hans-Georg%20Peitl&search_submit=1.updateProsets=1

Um nur einmal ein paar anzeigen.

Wie weit geht es Euch eigentlich um Objektivität und wie weit nur darum, irgendeinen mit Hassen Menschen bei der Rache, wofür weiss ich übrigens noch nicht einmal so genau, zu unterstützen? PastorPeitl2022 (talk) 08:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:OM-Pastor Hans-Georg Peitl[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:OM-Pastor Hans-Georg Peitl, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 07:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn heute ein Artikel über Joice Meyer in das Wikipedia käme, wäre es dann Eurer Meinung nach auch Werbung? Auch die ist immer noch lebende Autorin.

If you write today about joyce meyer in the wikipedia is it also promotion? Because joyce is living, too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IFCF2022 (talk • contribs) 08:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]