User talk:Pateb

Image tagging for Image:Portlicplate.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Portlicplate.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:German foreign Schools

Are you planning to create this category in the next few hours? Because otherwise, I see no point on adding it to so many articles. Victor Lopes (talk) 17:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

fansite

please do not continue to promote fansite links. it is not permitted. thanks. --emerson7 23:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

qualiflyer and crossair are/were interlinked business units of each other. with regard to fansites, please reference WP:ELNO. --emerson7 16:34, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i can only refer you once again to WP:EL and WP:ELNO for your answer. --emerson7 18:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

swissair infobox

grüezi. i have again removed the inappropriate edits for the infobox. the information should be added to the article. you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia makes it harder to read. Please take a moment or two to review the wp:mos guidelines on editing articles, and pay closer attention to the template instructions for infobox data. also, i do not think it is helpful to give insults and engage in unconstructive edit warring. continuing to do so may get you reported to administrators. cheers. --emerson7 22:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Torre velha da caparica.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Torre velha da caparica.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Swissair. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. emerson7 15:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. emerson7 15:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:German foreign Schools

For every category you create, you should specify parent categories to which it belongs. You can do this by listing the parents near the bottom of the page, each enclosed in double brackets like so:

[[Category:International schools by country of origin]]
[[Category:Hypothetical second category]]

I've added at least one parent to the category. I invite you to check my work for accuracy and completeness.

I am a human being, not a bot, so you can contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 18:05, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Dsl logo.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Dsl logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

swissair

an rfc has been requested for the article on swissair. please do not modify the content in question until the matter is resolved. also please note that wp:sockpuppets and ip accounts may not participate in discussions. --emerson7 06:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Swissair. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

once again, please note: an it is a violation of wp policy to continue to revert once an rfc is in place. you may make your case there for consensus. emerson7 14:36, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Migrosturk.gif

The file File:Migrosturk.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 14:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]