User talk:PatiBaut1995

Welcome![edit]

Hello, PatiBaut1995, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Romaine (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The project page can be found at: Wikipedia:Benelux Education Program/Maastricht University/FPN Historical Book Review Spring 2017. Romaine (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on your article[edit]

Hello PatiBaut1995, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. I especially will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay.

Intro sentence: You may improve by mentioning the profession of the author. First to paragraphs are great!
Links: Good start, but please add some more, like with: "moral", "social norms", etc.
Headers: okay, but 2nd one may be shorter
References: Missing!
Context/timeframe: great! (But only if you add multiple sources/references.)
How was the book received: Missing?
Other: Please use only one whiteline between sections.

I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our next meeting. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 10:01, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello PatiBaut1995, Thank you for improving your article! Last week we specifically asked to make sure you add sources/references to your article, because that is one of the most important parts of a Wikipedia article. We also wanted to make sure the intro sentence/section is ready. Let's see how it is going now.

Intro sentence: good!
Links: Thank you for the improvement! Maybe you can find a few more.
Headers: okay
References: Missing! Sources and references must be your first focus. Every paragraph should have at least one reference, preferable more. A single source can be used multiple times, but an article needs to have at least three independent sources (other than the book itself).
Context/timeframe: great!
How was the book received: Missing?
Other: I do not understand the last section, what is the purpose of it?

For today it is important that you add the references and sources, that was the assignment for this week... Romaine (talk) 02:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PatiBaut1995, The image you had requested to be scanned has been kept (and not deleted) because it is too simple to be copyrighted. I just added it to your sandbox article. Romaine (talk) 02:28, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]