User talk:Patmosko12

This is Patmosko12's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chinedum Enyinnaya Orji (May 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bkissin were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If Mr. Orji is a State Politician in Abia State, then he would pass Wikipedia's guidelines for political figures. However, it is not clear from the article that he is. You need to use reliable sources to back up any claims made in the article. A reliable source would be like a newspaper or a government website, etc. Also, this article should not be written to praise Mr. Orji. An article needs to be written from a neutral point of view.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chinedum Enyinnaya Orji and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chinedum Enyinnaya Orji, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 18:20, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Patmosko12! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 18:20, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promise Uzoma Okoro moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Promise Uzoma Okoro, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 18:21, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Hello Patmosko12. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Patmosko12. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Patmosko12|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Lapablo (talk) 20:25, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Deletion of Page Promise Uzoma Okoro[edit]

Helo Lapablo,I have just been notified of the deletion of the page Promise Uzoma Okoro due to sources related issue,from your message i want to state it clear that i am from Abia State and writing from an Independent point of View,not paid to write any article for someone.

Please your advice is highly needed to improve on the article,the subject is a young politician from Abia State.

Thank You Patmosko12 (talk) 03:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC) Patmosko12[reply]

Promise Uzoma Okoro moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Promise Uzoma Okoro, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 08:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Promise Uzoma Okoro, you may be blocked from editing. Lapablo (talk) 08:49, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Articles with Conflict of Interest need to go through AFC Review[edit]

Hello Patmosko12,

An article you recently created may be in violation of Wikipedia's WP:COI and because of this i have moved it to draftspace again. I would advise you use the submit button in the draft to submit your page for review, moving it on your own is highly not advisable. You can find your article Here. Lapablo (talk) 08:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thank You Lapablo,correction noted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chinedum Enyinnaya Orji (October 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Chinedum Enyinnaya Orji instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article on the subject has been in article space for approximately a year. This draft has also apparently been in the works for approximately a year. Does this draft contain any information that is not already in the article, or should the draft be redirected to the article?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chinedum Enyinnaya Orji and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chinedum Enyinnaya Orji, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:11, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Promise Uzoma Okoro[edit]

Hello, Patmosko12. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Promise Uzoma Okoro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just found out that another user has created ar article about the subject, its cool meh

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ikoro20. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 06:43, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]