User talk:PatriciaBishop

Welcome!

Hello, PatriciaBishop! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Shellwood (talk) 22:09, 25 August 2019 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thank you!PatriciaBishop (talk) 23:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about International Relations Lecture Series

Hello, PatriciaBishop,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Cwmhiraeth and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, International Relations Lecture Series should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Relations Lecture Series.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Whether this article should be included in Wikipedia or not depends on Wikipedia's notability policy which you can see here. Basically, if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article. In this instance, is this lecture series widely known? Are the lectures reported or discussed in national or local media sources? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Deb Lavender, from its old location at User:PatriciaBishop/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:14, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deb Lavender (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deb Lavender and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deb Lavender, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 13:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, PatriciaBishop! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 13:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

International Relations Lectures Series - Move to Draft Space?

@Cwmhiraeth: Hi. Should I move this article into a draft space until I can finish the research to complete it?PatriciaBishop (talk) 14:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

I think you should leave it where it is while it is being considered at AfD, which is normally one week. What you really need is to demonstrate that the lecture series is notable. Is the series discussed nationally, in the press, in magazines or on television? Has the series been discussed in books? Do the lectures later appear in print, or are the recipients just a few hundred people sitting in a lecture theatre? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:50, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

@Cwmhiraeth: Hi, I appreciate your help and direction. It doesn't look as though two other St. Louis articles were held to the high standard you describe. See the Oldani's and Hellmuth, Obata and Kasselbaum architects pages as two examples. There is also a page for Imo's pizza, which is popular but not notable. A speaker series, produced by women, that has been in existence for 90 years is far more notable than the subjects of those articles which have already been accepted for publication.PatriciaBishop (talk) 20:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

I am afraid "other stuff exists" is not a good argument, but we'll see what happens at AfD. Would people in Springfield or Kansas City know about these lectures? By the way, you should not include external links in the main body of the text, see Wikipedia:External links. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:19, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

@Cwmhiraeth: Hi, my argument is not "other stuff exists," it's that the subject matter of this article is being unreasonably held to a higher standard than many other articles, I believe, because the subject isn't in the popular culture. Why does a St. Louis bit of history have to be discussed nationally, be on TV, and discussed in books? The bar keeps getting raised for this article. I did not put the category "event" or "St. Louis events" on the article, and those categories should be removed.PatriciaBishop (talk) 13:38, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

If you can find and add any references to show the notability of the lecture series, that will help. Meanwhile, we will see how things go. My advice to you would be to find a more notable person or subject to work on. Have you come across the Women in Red Project? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi PatriciaBishop I hope you’re ok and making progress on your draft. Let me know if our like me to look at anything. All the best Mccapra (talk) 21:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Mccapra It will take a while to sort this. I found more records but they are in a terrible state. Currently working on the best, brief article I can write with extant material from this week's visit to Missouri State Archives. I hope it will be comprehensive enough to meet standards. The full article is a long-term project, I fear. Thank you for your offer of help. Have a wonderful weekend.--PatriciaBishop (talk) 00:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Ok good luck with it. Mccapra (talk) 22:57, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Deb Lavender concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Deb Lavender, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:International Relations Lecture Series

Hello, PatriciaBishop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "International Relations Lecture Series".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)