User talk:Patrick1425
Welcome![edit]
Hi, Patrick1425. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. – S. Rich (talk) 02:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Patrick1425, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Patrick1425! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC) |
Edit warring notice - May 2016[edit]
Your recent editing history at Anti-Arabism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
May 2016[edit]
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Anti-Arabism. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Patrick1425 reported by User:EvergreenFir (Result: ). Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Edit warring at Anti-Arabism[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The full report is at this 3RR complaint. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
July 2016[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arab Americans has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arab Americans was changed by Patrick1425 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881823 on 2016-07-30T02:41:42+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- You're currently spewing hate speech on Wikipedia, so please stop since this is obviously unacceptable. AcidSnow (talk) 07:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.In addition, editors with fewer than 500 edits—such as you—are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab–Israeli conflict per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Your editing of James Zogby ("Anti-Israel Advocacy") falls under this umbrella. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
July 2016[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 03:32, 31 July 2016 (UTC)- This edit [1] makes it clear that you are unable to productively edit Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 03:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)