User talk:Patriotaei

November 2013[edit]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Peter R. Orszag has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. The NY Times is not a tabloid. Please be more selective on what you delete. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your judicious trimming of sources. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:52, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Peter R. Orszag shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]