User talk:PaulCHebert

Sez You[edit]

I do not understand your comment, "sez you." See the article on height discrimination:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Height_discrimination

The article by Ms. Collins belittling people of petite stature is mean-spirited. I cited the article as one part of the historical record of Ms. Kaitlan Collins' journalism. I do not understand how this can be viewed as anything but mean spirited toward Senator Mikulski if you review the juxtaposition of the images with Ms.Collins' article, "Barbara Mikulski’s Hottest Moments " which appeared in the Daily Caller, July 30, 2014. Here is the citation for the archived article: https://web.archive.org/web/20160404001030/http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/30/barbara-mikulskis-hottest-moments-ever/

I hope you have a great day, too. It's a fine day to be a little person.Kmccook (talk) 20:53, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your comments with four tildes. (the crooked little lines on the upper left-hand of your keyboard). There was also no need to start yet another thread on this; the article's talk page would have been fine. I'm not defending what Collins said. I don't doubt that it's mean-spirited and hurtful to some people. But it needs to be sourced to independent, reliable, objective coverage, not to one user's reading of an article they dug up. That's the definition of original research. PaulCHebert (talk) 18:52, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article by Collins, "Barbara Mikulski’s Hottest Moments" is the only source needed. She wrote it. She posted it. She found pictures to humiliate the Senator. If you read the Collins article on Senator Mikulski you will know it is hurtful to all little people. It is the meanest article against little people I have ever encountered. A Wikipedia entry includes the individual's record of writing and achievements. I was alerted to the Collins article on Senator Mikulski, "Barbara Mikulski’s Hottest Moments " when it was published several years ago. At that time Ms. Collins worked for The Daily Caller. Since then she has moved to CNN a reliable news organization and it is important that journalists with biases be known for these biases so we may evaluate their writing in light of these biases.Kmccook (talk) 20:53, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to unwatch this topic now. But I don't like Randy Newman's song, either, and I know some little people just can't take a joke.Kmccook (talk) 21:12, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Everything you say is true, and also irrelevant to the question of whether or not it is original research as you have written it. PaulCHebert (talk) 21:14, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Bolduan[edit]

You can not simply delete everything what you not like. That was a terrorist attack. Stop supressing what happened. Stop supressing reality. This is not a blog, I wrote about what happened. It is based upon facts and third party sources. There is not a single word of personal opinion it it. Tlwm (talk) 17:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am suppressing nothing -- see the relevant talk page, where you should have started this discussion, for my thoughts. I will also remind you that the last time that you accused me of "suppressing" things, you got yourself banned for a little while. Keep that in mind as you move forward. PaulCHebert (talk) 18:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop threatening me Tlwm (talk) 18:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You should discuss with me before deleting stuff. Tlwm (talk) 18:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Achieve some respect for other people. Tlwm (talk) 18:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please limit your comments to the content of articles on the relevant talk pages. I have no interest in your personal opinions of me or in any advice that you may give me. PaulCHebert (talk) 18:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, PaulCHebert. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

King Salman[edit]

The claim that King Salman is suffering from Alzheimer's disease was mentioned by The Economist (not mentioned in your provided source) during 2014 with no credible and known sources support the report’s claim. Nevertheless, since that date, King Salman has been engaging in many national and international events and no credible evidences have supported this claim that even has not been covered again by multiple credible sources due the lack of reliable sources could clearly support this claim. More important notice that despite the nature of this disease that is getting worse by time, the claim has not been proved up to this date which means that this claim is completely false. It seems that including such a claim tends to be a personal perspective rather than verifiable added contents.

Thanks

Jaseromer (talk) 18:45, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think I ever edited the article to say that, but whatever. PaulCHebert (talk) 20:40, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, PaulCHebert. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 21:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Danny Gottlieb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Franks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jussie Smollett[edit]

I believe that the lede for the Smollett-Bell article should be expanded. What three errors did I add to the lede? I would like to add accurate info to the lede ASAP. MagicatthemovieS (talk) 22:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Gab_(social_network)#Gab Dissenter merge[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Gab_(social_network)#Gab Dissenter merge. Hi Paul. This RfC might interest you as you were one of the main contributors to the page. Thanks. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 22:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]