User talk:Pavan Kumar Saarang N R

Pavan Kumar Saarang N R, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pavan Kumar Saarang N R! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 18:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 18:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please remove all external links from the body of the draft and include independent reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Pavan Kumar Saarang N R/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pavan Kumar (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is non-neutral and is written to praise its subject rather than to describe him neutrally. This draft has external links in the article body; they are not permitted. This draft has promotional aspects. This draft has formatting inconsistencies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pavan Kumar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:29, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pavan Kumar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pavan Kumar. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:37, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pavan Kumar Saarang N R (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

plezz unblock me this is the first to writing article.

Decline reason:

Your unblock request does not address the reason for your block. And regardless, your article was totally inappropriate. Yamla (talk) 11:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note

If you continue pushing your auto-biography, like you did here, your talk page access will be revoked! Favonian (talk) 11:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pavan Kumar Saarang N R (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promies you that i never do mistake again and agin.Already i removed all the external links.so please give me a chance to edit my article.

Decline reason:

We don't get to write about ourselves on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:55, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You say you will "never do mistake again" and then threaten to continue editing your article again. That article was totally inappropriate. It wasn't just the external links; the entire article was inappropriate for Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 12:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pavan Kumar Saarang N R (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my account is blocked because,my entire artical was in appropriate.so im sorry for that.please give me the chance,i will correct it.

Decline reason:

If you wish to write about something on Wikipedia that isn't you, please use the UTRS process to request an unblock. If you only want to be unblocked in order to write about yourself, please don't bother - go and join LinkedIn or something instead. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In Wikipedia you are not allowed to write about yourself; there is therefore nothing to correct. that being so, if unblocked what do you want to write about?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:08, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Considering this, your most recent edit, it's a bit difficult to believe that you have learned anything. Favonian (talk) 16:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because of WP:IDHT, I have revoked your talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 21:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note to reviewing admin: this user was socking as recently as 02:29, 3 April 2017 UTC. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]