User talk:Pcarrollufi

Get online week

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Get online week, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://interculturalarts.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=673:get-on-board-with-get-online-week&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=84.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:57, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:New concept - Wiki.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:New concept - Wiki.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Good to go - Wiki.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Good to go - Wiki.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Licenses still not added

Hello, you asked me to restore the 2 files listed above with an indication that you would fix them properly, but you did not do so yet and it does not appear that you have made any changes to them at all. As a result, I am going to tag the files again now for deletion. This will give you 7 more days to fix them or they will be deleted again. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 09:58, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Little Chef.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Little Chef.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 07:36, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've replaced this image with File:Little Chef.png, for a couple of reasons:

Since this logo has not been released under a free license by the copyright holder, we can use it here only under the conditions of the Wikipedia non-free content policy. In particular, the third condition requires that we use a low-resolution image rather than a high-resolution image.
A simple drawing like this, with clearly defined edges and large blocks of color, is more accurately and efficiently stored in the PNG format rather than the JPEG format. The JPEG format is a lossy format, which means that it introduces compression artifacts into the image. These artifacts appear in this image as ripples of varying shades of red near the sharp edges where the red meets the white. The PNG format does not suffer from this problem, and stores the image exactly, with no degradation of quality. See Wikipedia:Preparing images for upload for more information.

Let me know if you have questions. —Bkell (talk) 07:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]