User talk:Pdswashington

Request[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit fully-protected is being considered for merging. ›

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdswashington (talk • contribs) 03:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can click "Submit" to submit your draft for review – Thjarkur (talk) 08:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also remember that Wikipedia is not for promotion. See our guide for editors with a conflict of interest. – Thjarkur (talk) 08:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pdswashington, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Pdswashington! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Padmini Dutta Sharma (August 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More detail needed of how this person's achievements meet the notability criteria on Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Padmini Dutta Sharma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Padmini Dutta Sharma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:00, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Padmini Dutta Sharma has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Padmini Dutta Sharma. Thanks! Eagleash (talk) 08:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Padmini Dutta Sharma (September 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Re-submitted very dhortly after return to draftspace without any attempt at addressing the issues. External links are not permitted in the content and references need to be palced inline per WP:REFB. Please study links supplied. If the item is submitted again without improvemnt it could be liable to rejection or deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Padmini Dutta Sharma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Padmini Dutta Sharma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 09:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Padmini Dutta Sharma has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Padmini Dutta Sharma. Thanks! Eagleash (talk) 09:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Pdswashington! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Remove my page completely from Wikitia, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]