User talk:PenchoLinden
Welcome![edit]
Hi PenchoLinden! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Megaman en m (talk) 13:50, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
September 2020[edit]
Hello, I'm Helper202. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sigmund Freud without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Helper202 (talk) 14:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 14:38, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) I would add to the above (canned) message that your edit summary of "I will be doing this three times a day" is fairly strong evidence of your intention to edit-war, even if it carefully avoids the bright-line limit of WP:3RR. Your Wikipedia career will not be long if you keep this attitude. TigraanClick here to contact me 14:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
PenchoLinden, you're already in blockable territory, since I have no doubt you first made that edit without an account. Your edit summary is telling: you don't know what De Beauvoir said, and yet you removed that material. That cannot be. Nor can you remove this three times a day, since that will get you blocked as well. My suggestion is that you look up The Second Sex and read it--it's a very interesting book and has changed many a life. And then, if you like, take up discussion on the talk page. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 14:41, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 14:45, 30 September 2020 (UTC)- Because of your repeated abuse of the WP:UTRS facility, I have extended your block to indefinite. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:35, 5 October 2020 (UTC)