User talk:Pentaquark

Welcome[edit]

Hello Pentaquark and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 05:41, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Jd22292. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Monstercat, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. While you have provided a source, it has been determined to be unreliable. Please review WP:RS. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 19:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leijurv, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 04:09, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pentaquark (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm requesting to be unblocked from the investigation into sockpuppetry. Leijurv and I are friends, and a few days ago we decided to work on a Wikipedia article about the label Wolf Beats. We made similar edits as we were working next to each other, and this was the first time we had both edited Wikipedia in a while, so I can see why this seems like we are the same person. The reason this account has sporadic edits with large gaps in between is because I don't edit Wikipedia frequently. I am willing to provide whatever proof is necessary to show that Leijurv and I are not the same person.

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was admitted over on User talk:Leijurv (where the exact situation was described by Berean Hunter (talk · contribs). Yamla (talk) 11:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The problem seems to be co-ordinating efforts off wiki. This is still a form of sockpuppetry. There is more discussion on his talk page. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:06, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wolf Beats for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wolf Beats is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolf Beats until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unblock on hold | Bbb23 |2=The account User:Leijurv successfully appealed his initial block for sockpuppetry of multiple accounts (including mine) as visible at the bottom of his talk page. Because I was one of the supposed sock puppets of the initial accusation (which was false), I believe I should be unblocked. Note that I was not a sock puppet of his second accusation which was true. @Berean Hunter:, @Bbb23:, and @Ben Creasy: were all involved with Leijurv's investigation and may be able to provide insight. | AGK ■ 22:16, 28 October 2018 (UTC)}}[reply]

Request moved to end to retain history. AGK ■ 19:21, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Link to User:Leijurv's successful appeal to Arbcom. ——SerialNumber54129 12:54, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have confirmed with the blocking administrator that they wish for a decision to be taken without further input. AGK ■ 19:16, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Pentaquark (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The account User:Leijurv successfully appealed his initial block for sockpuppetry of multiple accounts (including mine) as visible at the bottom of his talk page. Because I was one of the supposed sock puppets of the initial accusation (which was false), I believe I should be unblocked. Note that I was not a sock puppet of his second accusation which was true. @Berean Hunter:, @Bbb23:, and @Ben Creasy: were all involved with Leijurv's investigation and may be able to provide insight.

Accept reason:

I am satisfied that you have more to offer Wikipedia. Please ensure you edit fully in keeping with our policy at Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. If you and any other friends again give reason to think you are not complying with this policy, you may be re-blocked again. AGK ■ 19:21, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]