User talk:Peoplearestrange 11

Hi. It was short it was brief and now I must say cheerio.

January 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jim Morrison. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain how my edits were disruptive? I am bothered by a party line that has a crazy deluded stalker who had maybe 10 days with Jim Morrison getting center stage. Pam Courson was JM’s live in girlfriend. I wish people would do their research before becoming the parrots of people they don’t know. If PK were correct in her outrageous claims of being JM’s “ widow” then why have so many credible people who knew Jim, Pam and Patricia come out and countered PK’s narrative? Ok! So you can play Wikipedia gestapo. Please do research. I will leave the wiki scene but I am not alone in knowing what is true and what is not. This is nothing more than the thought police in action. Funny. A colleague from university who became a college professor began telling his students to avoid Wikipedia like the plague. I thought he was being absurd. However, tonight has me thinking he was right. Who knew?? Peoplearestrange 11 (talk) 05:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Patricia Kennealy-Morrison, you may be blocked from editing. Talk pages are for discussing improvements to articles, not posting polemics against people you dislike, or your personal theories about celebrities. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 21:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well well! At least now we know you aren’t PK herself, since she checked out last summer. However, you all are pretty much a glum lot. Oh and PK a celebrity?? Thank you for showing me that I’m not the crazy one🤣 Peoplearestrange 11 (talk) 21:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict) Additionally, your response to Johnj1995, above, violates Wikipedia's core policy of civility. Calling someone "gestapo" for stopping your vandalism is ridiculous and unacceptable. Do not engage in personal attacks on editors or your ability to edit the encyclopedia will be removed. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 21:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can keep your “encyclopedia “. I know the real score as far as the truth is concerned. Bye! Peoplearestrange 11 (talk) 21:55, 24 January 2022 (UTC)oh and I have never heard of “poof dragon”, or what ever else you think i may be.[reply]