User talk:Pepe1979

Welcome![edit]

Hi Pepe1979! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Grimes2 (talk) 15:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That article already existed[edit]

See Desiderius-Erasmus-Stiftung! --Orange Mike | Talk 19:26, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you![edit]

Thanks for creating Joachim Starbatty. Well written and informative. Mccapra (talk) 05:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Joachim Starbatty[edit]

Hello, Pepe1979,

Thank you for creating Joachim Starbatty.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It’s not a good idea to use bare web links as sources. When you’re editing click on the ‘cite’ button at the top of the edit screen and select the ‘cite web” option. It will auto generate a template for you to use.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 05:54, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Translations[edit]

It’s fine to translate or part-translate an article from another language Wikipedia. If you do this you also need to do create a talk page for the article and add a template to it (see here). Let me know if you need help with this by leaving a message in my talk page. Mccapra (talk) 06:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Pepe1979

Thank you for creating Karlheinz Weißmann.

User:Sam-2727, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Try adding more sources next time to back up all of your material. There are plenty on the german entry for this guy.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sam-2727}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sam-2727 (talk) 21:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliothek des Konservatismus moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Bibliothek des Konservatismus, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Loksmythe (talk) 22:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Loksmythe, You were a bit too quick to move the article before I could add a couple of references that I found on the German Wikipedia article for the Library. Would you please check the article now. Thanks!--Pepe1979 (talk) 22:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bibliothek des Konservatismus (August 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Bibliothek des Konservatismus instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bibliothek des Konservatismus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bibliothek des Konservatismus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pepe1979! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bibliothek des Konservatismus has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bibliothek des Konservatismus. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:26, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfgang Ockenfels moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Wolfgang Ockenfels, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 08:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wolfgang Ockenfels[edit]

Hello, Pepe1979. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wolfgang Ockenfels, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wolfgang Ockenfels[edit]

Hello, Pepe1979. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wolfgang Ockenfels".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The European Conservative[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The European Conservative, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The European Conservative for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The European Conservative is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The European Conservative until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PRAXIDICAE💕 17:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chronicles Magazine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samuel Francis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]