User talk:Peripatetic/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 5

Re: Directory-fication of Bangladeshi topics

Thanks for your idea. This is good. I have also been trying to persuade more people into working on Wikipedia's Bangladesh/Bangla related articles, with almost no success. After my initial posts, I even had to revert a spate of vandalism from some people, who created a mess. Anyway, I like the idea of a directory, and I think the best way to organize things would be to use the page Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladesh page. We can list articles there, and also have a to-do section of articles, requested articles etc. I think there are now 3-4 people regularly writing articles on Bangladesh, so co-ordinating should not be a big problem. This being summer, I can and regularly do devote a lot of time to wikipedia, and I can do 3-5 articles per week. Let's have the list of Bangladesh related articles in the wikiproject page first, I'll add what I find there, then we can sort, categorize etc. Thanks once again for participating in wikipedia. --Ragib 11:12, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Copyvios

The copyvios aren't minor they are entire sentences and paragpahs of text, the page must be deleted since they were there when you put the page into Wikipedia. Rewrite a clean version on the temp page.--nixie 23:58, 18 July 2005 (UTC)


I'm not sure where you stand on intellectual honesty, but the article is mostly a paraphrase of the ODNB entry. The copyvio policy is not mine its wikipedias. This is the worst example.

Your text:

Brydon was awarded medals for his service in Jalalabad, Kabul, Burma, and Lucknow. In 1858, he was appointed a Companion of the Bath. The following year, he retired from the service of the Company with the rank of surgeon-general, and settled down in the Scottish Highlands. He died in 1873 at the age of 61 in his home in Westfield, Ross-shire. His wife, Colina Maxwell Brydon, survived him.

ODNB:

Brydon was awarded medals for his service in Jalalabad, Kabul, Burma, and Lucknow, and in 1858 was appointed a companion of the Bath. In the following year he retired from the Indian service. He settled in the highlands of Scotland, and in 1862 became honorary surgeon to the Highland rifle militia. He died at his home, Westfield House, Nigg, Ross-shire, on 20 March 1873, and was buried in the same month at the Rosemarkie burial-ground. His wife, Colina Maxwell Brydon, survived him. --nixie 00:10, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

If someone has one of my sources and reads my article and can see where I've just reorganised the word order, I think thats pretty clearly plagarism. There is however no policy on plagarism, and it is not a clear copyvio since some ofhte text is not in the ODNB entry (I don't have easy access to the other sources to check them). I think you should rewrite anything that you know is a bit too close the the original phrasing, but otherwise it's OK to take down the copyvio notice.--nixie 23:02, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Districts of Bangladesh

Please check out task 6 and 7 on the Bangladesh Project page. Help us out if you have time. Thanks. -- Urnonav 9 July 2005 12:29 (UTC)


I started a discussion on the common format for District articles in Talk:Districts of Bangladesh. Please participate in the discussion and add your ideas. Thanks. --Ragib 00:14, 17 July 2005 (UTC)


Ok, I finished creating articles on all 64 districts, added a navigation template to almost all, and have inserted the standard sections to most of them. Now is the time for some other volunteers to insert information into them, may be taking stats/info from Banglapedia and paraphrasing that. You can start by taking over any articles from the nav template at Template:Subdivisions of Bangladesh. --Ragib 06:49, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

J das

Seems someone did the job. thanks for pointing out, though --ppm 12:23, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

Lionel Davidson

Hi there.. just wanted to ask about the recent change to the Davidson article.. might I ask your source for the Kingston on Hull reference? --Peripatetic 20:11, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

I'm doing disambiguation link repair. If you check into the link in my edit comments, you'll see the project I'm working on. The basic idea is that we don't want links pointing to disambiguation pages as much as possible, but rather we want them pointing to the real page for what they reference. In the specific case, I was working through all articles that point to "Hull". Many were references to ship hulls. Many were to the city Hull, Yorkshire, England. A few were to a former city named Hull in Quebec.
For the Hull in Yorkshire, from the Hull Disambiguation page, the correct link is actually titled Kingston on Hull. I have no idea why it's called that, but that's the correct page for that city. And the Lionel Davidson page was obviously referring to that Hull, so I updated the link.
So in the end, no external source, but extending information already in the Davidson and Hull Disambiguation pages to properly execute the project to improve Wikepedia. TexasAndroid 21:21, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

Hi

I see you've been editing cricket-related articles recently. Have you see the Cricket WikiProject yet? It's a group of cricket-loving Wikipedians who use the WikiProject both to collaborate and to highlight to others what they're doing. You'd be more than welcome to sign up and join, jguk 19:17, 27 August 2005 (UTC)


It seems you started the article on Dr Muzaffar Ahamed. I might be interested in working on this article, but I'm not sure which Muzaffar Ahamed this is. Is this the curent Chairman of National Awami Party (Bangladesh) or am I totally off the mark here? Then again, he's not a professor at IBA, although that's the first Muzaffar Ahmed that comes to my mind. Thanks,

Urnonav 08:28, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Yeah there is NAP neta Muzaffar Ahmed. And then there is economist Muzaffar Ahmed. The two are different. I don't know too much myself about the first one. The second one is an economist and university professor. If you can find any info, you could do both! --Peripatetic 08:36, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Mohiner Ghoraguli

I'm sorry, but I myself know very little about the old band (though I remember winning points at a quiz by identifying a song as have been sung by MG). You can try [1] for album cover, though it's rather small. Incidentally, I've been hunting around quite long for the song "Prithibita Naki Chhoto Hote Hote Satellite Ar Cable-er hate" but can't seem to get it. If you have it then can you send it to me? You are also welcome to contribute to the Chandrabindu article. Loom91 17:10, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

My e-mail address is loom91@yahoo.com, you can just attach it. Thanks. Loom91 17:48, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Recieved it properly. Thank you very much. I believe Krosswindz perform this song nowdays, right? Loom91 18:10, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

unsourced image

Please provide source information for File:LIONEL.gif or it is likely to be deleted. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:14, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Unsourced images

You have many images listed as being un-sourced. See User:Pearle/by-author-Category:Images_with_unknown_source.txt for a nice, wikified list of them. (Search for your name). If you do not add a source, they will probably all be deleted really soon(as in, people are deleting images in this category - RIGHT NOW). JesseW, the juggling janitor 09:19, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

A lot of those pics are more than 50 yrs old. Mainly because the writers themselves have been dead for longer than that. -- Peripatetic 22:50, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
The critical year is 1923 (See Public domain). That's the general year for things going out of copyright. If you are sure that the subject had died before that date, the picture should be pretty safely assumed to be public domain - of course, a source is still necessary to be sure that the picture does in fact, show the person in question. ;-) But if you can remember where you got any of those pictures, it would be a great help - then the remaining issue would be if we have a legal license to use them. Otherwise they will be deleted, sadly. JesseW, the juggling janitor 17:20, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

List of cricket books

Just a quick line to say thanks for your suggestion re finding additional titles. I've bookmarked the link and I'll make use of it before long: it might help me track down a couple of titles on my own wants list too! All the best. --Jack 10:41, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Please tag all your images

Hello please realise that if you do not tag your images you make a lot of work for other people who have to tag all untagged images (perhaps you can find time to help us) Wikipedia:Untagged_Images please find the appropriate tag for your images here Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags or ask me for help. Thankyou Arnie587 23:30, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Mohiner

Well, actually I am no authority about Mohin, having joined college in 1998, a year before the new-look Mohin lost steam. At first glance, the facts look consistent, though. You might want to make album pages ?

Pradiptaray 17:11, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


Bengal Famine

Hello, I see that you had worked on the Bengal Famine page. I have recently edited it to make it more accurate. Specifically I have challenged the "diseased rice" explanation for the famine. Just thought you might be interested. Regards, Jayanta Sen 17:37, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

1911 EB

To respond to your question about the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, the answer is yes. Just use this template in the references section of your article --> {{1911}} and you should be fine. --DanielCD 22:00, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Cool deal. You can follow the link that template makes into the whole world of combined Wiki-EB1911ism. --DanielCD 22:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

RFC/KM

You commented on Kelly Martin's second RfC. it is up for archival. you may vote at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Kelly_Martin#Archiving_this_RfC. CastAStone|(talk) 03:58, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Please add whatever BD related article you see missing from it now. This is in line with other pages like List of India-related topics. The utility of having this is that you can open the page, clieck "Related changes" on the left panel, and see if anything has changed in the articles. Really a handy tool, rather than having all articles in your watchlist. --Ragib 08:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Betjbw.jpg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Betjbw.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Longhair 11:57, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

DYK

Updated DYK query Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Lydia Chukovskaya, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Gurubrahma 06:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Poll 3

I was wondering if you wouldn't consider to vote on the Poll. The number of + votes might encourage the others. Best... Resid Gulerdem 15:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi there. I've noticed your great work on Russia-related article and decided to recommend to add to your watchlist these two notice-boards: Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. Please check them out now and then. Thanks for your time, Ghirla | talk 12:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)Ghirla | talk 23:00, 6 February 2006 (UTC)


Hi Peripatetic , I have read ur message to Jimpo , actually i think that the best idea is to propose a suggessted policy to hide all offensive pics for all religions not anly islam behind a fold ... icluding : Piss Christ , blackface , pic in anti-semistism .. and so on ... can u prepare such a text for this proposed policy , what do u think about that --Chaos 14:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Pavel Dolgoruki

Thank you for the article on Pavel. Do you have any source which names his parents? I am interested to see if we can connect him to some of the other Dolgorukovs. Wjhonson 23:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

My source was Dolgorukov's obits in the British press in '27. Alas, parents were not mentioned. But I am pretty sure, going by the patronymic, that his dad was called Dmitri Dolgorukov!!! --Peripatetic 01:26, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for your kind words on my talk page. I was in the Adam Smith building, too, and I lived around 10 minutes from you. What did you study? Nach0king 09:53, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Can you please tell me how you made this image? --Gmaxwell 02:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

As you are a member of the WikiProject Business and Economics, your help is kindly requested in the section of the AIDS article linked to above. Any help would be appreciated. --Bob 18:36, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Grea work on Mohiner Ghoraguli

You have done a very great work on the Mohiner Ghoraguli article, considering how difficult it is to find information on the band. If you have some time, you may wish to consider improving the article [[Chandrabindu (band}]], it is currently rather short and lacking in factual informtion. Thank you very much. Loom91 10:39, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


uploading bangla band music

is there any way to upload music by bangla bands on to wikipedia? I have quite an extensive collection...

BengalRenaissanceEccentrica 00:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject London

Hi,

You are currently listed as a participant in WikiProject London, so you may like to know that the participation list is being update. Contributors are asked to bold their names if they are still contributing to London-related projects. Inactive members will be removed at the end of the month. Thanks for participating, COME ON ENGLAND! DJR COME ON ENGLAND! (Talk) 15:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


Thanks

Many many thanks. By the way, why most of the poets's name are in RED in your preference? Were the articles deleted? Were not they created? --Maksud3 18:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

British bengalis

You can go for a deletion review at WP:DR. --Ragib 18:05, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Clementina Panella

Heya. Yesterday, you created a link to Clementina Panella in the article on the Arch of Constantine (References section). As there's no article on Panella (an archeologist at the Università La Sapienza in Rome): do you plan to create it, or is there any specific reason for adding the link? Regards, Varana 12:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

I see that Wetman just created the article, so the question is moot. Varana 19:55, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


Lawrence James

Hi - thanks for your constructive comment on my postulation. Looks like Lemorgoth disagrees with us, but I'll add a sentence or two and see if I'm blown out of the water!! Let's wait and see.... --Baggie 19:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Hrishikesh Mukherjee

He was Bengali and started working in Calcutta, initial work was assisting Bimal Roy a known director who made Hindi and Bengali films, but then Hrishikesh had to move to Bombay as hindi movies made in Calcutta started to dry up. As per his filmography in imdb he seems to have worked only in and on Hindi films. Haphar 08:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Bn

Hey, if you have time, do visit bn wiki too. We are 9300+ now, and also have started Featured article nomination process. See the noticeboard for the whole process details, and please express your opinion in the FA page. Thanks. --Ragib 07:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

link to British

Hello, when you want to link to the article about something British, please do not link to British, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as United Kingdom or Great Britain by writing out [[United Kingdom|British]] or [[Great Britain|British]]. Regards, Jeff3000 14:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Nazrul and Dhaka FACs

Hi Peripatetic - please do visit the FACs of Dhaka and Kazi Nazrul Islam. I need your input and criticism. Rama's arrow 21:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bronstein.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bronstein.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

I've tried to address the oversight you described by adding a new sourced paragraph and have placed the section in chronological order. Thanks for your advice.--Zleitzen 20:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Unblock request

We can't unblock you at this time, because you haven't given us the information we need to look into your block. You yourself were not blocked; if you were prevented from editing, you must have been autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. I'm removing your unblock request because there's nothing we can do without this information. If you are still autoblocked by the time you read this message:

  1. Try and edit the Wikipedia:Sandbox by clicking here.
  2. Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "Autoblocked?" section.
  3. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. --  Netsnipe  ►  18:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Preview

I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Geniac 15:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Matt Yglesias

On the Matthew Yglesias talkpage you've been accused of being... Matt Yglesias. Just for the record: you're not, right. :) Makgraf 19:17, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

F.Y.I.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center (3rd). Best wishes, Travb (talk) 23:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:248797-music-resized200.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:248797-music-resized200.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject History of Bangladesh has started. It needs members and participants. Aditya Kabir 11:45, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Fortune Theatre

Hi you have a mention of this theatre somewhere in your archive/watchlist. I am currently in the process of splitting this page between the modern theatre and a page Fortune Playhouse for the historic theatre. If you wish to continue to 'watch' developments on the historic article, you should add that to your watch page. Cheers. Kbthompson 11:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi again. Nice navigation box (/West End); anychance of nicking it as a template for West End theatres? Was that your intention? Kbthompson 13:09, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
In the end, I just nicked the idea and based it on something pinched from WWII! But it was a good idea, and in the nature of good ideas, it has been used! Kbthompson 10:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Theatres were added (and checked) from cat:theatres in London, if any are added to the template, it means they have the wrong category; and that should also be adjusted. Cheers. Kbthompson 11:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, can you help by adding the Bangla/Hindi scripts for Chaunk? Do you know which language this term comes from (and the etymology of the word)? And which language pronounces it "chaunk" and which pronounces it "chaunce"? And can it also be called tarka or baghar? Badagnani 04:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Forster_young.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Forster_young.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Horatiorama 08:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

The Picture is a pixel by pixel copy of the source (with the logo cut out). The original picture at Cambridge is in the PD, the image source is not. The owner of the website has not been asked for permission.

AfD nomination of Arnob

I've nominated Arnob, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Arnob satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnob and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Arnob during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Bubba hotep 09:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Adjani_1977_Time_cover.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Adjani_1977_Time_cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Just give me a couple of days. I'll have to look for the images you are looking for. That assured I'd like to volunteer a few suggestions:

  • Please, cite the sources for all the information you (and other editors) have put into the article. It is imperative that FA articles are amply referenced and cited.
  • Submit the article as GA nominee first, and work on the feedback you get there. It's the first step towards an FA status.
  • Before submtting it to GA nomination, you may well try a peer review, and then work on the feedback.
  • And, may be before that you make sure that it conformas to the manual of style.
  • When other editors have taken a look at it (if you need, you can invite potential reviewers to take a look at it, you may well get a good copyeditor to run through it.
  • Here goes a few useful pages on the Wikipedia that would come handy, if you really want drive for an FA:
FAs are the hallmarks of Wikipedia quality, they need to be extra good, and I am happy to see someone volunteering for that hard work.
  • A few more ideas:
    • Add an suitable biographical infobox (find one at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography)
    • Gather as many works of Das as possible (essays, novels, short fictions, plays)
    • Move Banalata Sen to a new page
    • Take a look at some of the writer articles to get a better idea (you find plenty at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Arts and entertainment)
    • Make the leader a summary of the whole article, ideally consisting more than one paragraph.
    • Early life and Life in Calcutta (that would be Kolkata) should become parts of Biography
    • The political part of his life should be a part of Biography, not Literary style.
    • You would absolutely need critical assesment (by famous critics, of course with appropriate references and citations) and if possible criticism of Das's work to make the article complete.

Great going. Cheers. Aditya Kabir 20:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I can offer to volunteer for two things - (1) I can get books on this end and use them to assist you, since I live in Bangladesh; and (2) I can post to editors who may take an interest. I would have jumped right in, but that too will have to wait a few days (like the images). Cheers. Aditya Kabir 20:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Scot arts.gif

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Scot arts.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Talk:Billmon

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Talk:Billmon, by 151.197.244.202 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Talk:Billmon seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Talk:Billmon, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Talk:Billmon itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:21, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/9/11/6215/76561

Image:0486256367.jpg

I have tagged Image:0486256367.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Qst 19:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Author.jpg

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Author.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 07:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Jessica Warner

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jessica Warner, by Drivenapart (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jessica Warner seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jessica Warner, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:56, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I'd like to draw your attention to Bangladesh portal. I have tried to address the concerns in earlier peer review and checked the portal against Featured portal criteria. Based on this I think it is proper time to push for Featured Portal status for Bangladesh Portal, which will be an important milestone for WikiProject Bangladesh. But to achieve this I need help from you. Please participate in the on-going discussion on the talk page and give me your valuable inputs.-Arman Aziz 03:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Theatre box

Thanks for your Curtain plaudits on theatre infobox and questions about the London theatre template. Sorry for the delay in replying, I have been on a technology free Sabbatical, for two weeks (that's a holiday to anyone else).

This probably gets more complicated than it needs to be:

  1. Wiltons - this is not on the London theatre template because it doesn't seem to currently be in regular use. It should probably be added to 'Fringe and Suburban', and that's my omission (because I wrote it!); still in two minds, as it's not an active theatre producing/receiving centre and when it does do things, it is more usually opera.
  1. Bush and Theatre Royal East; again an interest because I fiddled with the latter and expanded Theatre Workshop (not all covered in Joan Littlewood article). These went into 'Fringe and Suburban', because that's what they essentially are. Yes, they have an impact out of proportion to their category, but you have to draw the line somewhere, and I see that template as being about the current theatre scene. There's probably room somewhere for an article about important developments in London theatre, and a historical timeline (there's probably a book, or two, in it!).

The past month, or so, I have also become busy in real life - and that's been interfering with my wiki writing. Sometimes, it's no bad thing to step back from these things, my views change. If I do get time, I want to complete the rollout of the infobox to suburban theatres, write an article on Studio theatre (currently a disamb to theatres), contribute to London articles and generally have far greater ambitions than I can possibly have time for! Kbthompson 08:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Responding to your suggestion I have now transformed your stub into a 750 word article covering all the bases. Although my guess is that few will look beyond the Daphne du Maurier article when seeking information about the play.

I wonder, do we know each other?

Best wishes John Thaxter 18:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Beverley Baxter

Having quoted extensively from Beverley Baxter's review of The Years Between prompted me to look at Baxter's wiki article, only to find no mention of his role as a theatre enthusiast, failed playwright, overwrought theatre critic and victim of Milton Shulman and Ken Tynan.

I have repaired the omission with a new paragraph London theatre critic that you may find amusing.

Best wishes, John Thaxter 09:46, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

DYK

Updated DYK query On 10 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Augustine Podmore Williams, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Keep up the great work! --Royalbroil 04:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Chains (play)

Hi,

Were you planning on creating Chains (play) in the near future? If not, the redlink should probably be removed. There's no reason to have a redlink on a disambiguation page. The line itself could stay I suppose, probably not as a link. WLU (talk) 18:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Dear Peripatetic (Have we met? I think I asked you that before),
Thanks for the Chains (play) page. You have already linked my Stage review to that page, so you have my reaction to the play and Auriol's production. I was glad you have also created a page for Auriol Smith. I have edited it sightly, adding her involvement with the BBC Radio Drama Repertory Company (sadly now disbanded, although Ellen Dryden's First/Writes independent production company has taken up some of the slack).
I also added that Sam is not only Auriol's husband and co-founder of the Orange Tree but is also its Artistic Director.
I have created a major new page about the Orange Tree Theatre itself, but all about the history and the building. I have been working with people at the theatre hoping to resolve the matter of how we feature the repertory and the major productions, but they tend to be too busy to help, and it takes forever to go through my archives.
Best wishes John Thaxter (talk) 17:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Theatre assistance

Thanks for your offer of help.

I am currently being asked to deliver an upgrade to the Anton Rodgers page. I have details of his CV from the start until 1979, when Theatre Who's Who disappeared from our bookshelves. I have scanned the relevant page which now sits reproachfully on my laptop. But it badly needs translation into wiki format. I can email you the scanned page if that will not breach your peripatetic anonymity!

Otherwise I shall slog on to the end - although much distracted at the moment by a dozen Christmas shows I have to review for The Stage.

Beyond the 1979 Who's Who CV I would then have to translate from my own 1980 index and copies of the Theatre Record (1981-2006) annual indexes. Do you also happen to have access to the latter? It would be a great help if you do, as otherwise I seem to be the sole User source of London theatre details on wiki, which is a terrible responsiblity! John Thaxter (talk) 15:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Auriol Smith

I have greatly enlarged your article on Auriol Smith qv. John Thaxter (talk) 12:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Now what about one on her husband Sam Walters? John Thaxter (talk) 12:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Orange Tree Theatre

Over Christmas I have added an article on Sam Walters, amplified Auriol Smith's page still further, and done much work on the Orange Tree Theatre page. For these three I am awaiting programme listings for the early years in the Room Above the Pub - the Richmond Fringe period from1971, which is nowhere documented other than in the Orange Tree archives. Sam has promised to provide these!

I have also done related work on the articles for Alec McCowen, Martin Crimp, Geoffrey Beevers, Christopher Hampton and Harley Granville Barker, all of whom have links with the Orange Tree.

I welcome your London theatre endeavours and have done a small editing job on your three new pages, opening out the paragraphs for easier reading and access. In the case of David Salter I have provided References and a couple of useful links - as a result of which I was able to delete the 'Unreferenced' editorial flag at the top of the article - I hope that's okay.

But the problem of your three new articles, as they stand, is a general lack of firm information, sources, dates and venues. This of course would be helped by access to Theatre Record listings or the artiste's agent! I may manage to do a few for you, but it is very hard work.

Best wishes for 2008. Yours John Thaxter (talk) 13:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kundu poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kundu poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Anton Rodgers

In an idle moment I took over the chore of transferring Anton Rodgers' Theatre Who's Who CV to the Wiki page.

It also gave me the opportunity to do some tidying of the Monty Norman page (mainly about his SWET award in 1982 for Songbook — I was on the judging panel at the time, so I had insider knowledge!). I also linked the Northcott Theatre, Exeter page to The Stage news reports on the current round of ACE funding cuts. Hope all is well with you. Best wishes John Thaxter (talk) 15:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Orange Tree

Thanks for your note. I did not get to the Hackney panto, but my review of The Woman Hater (linked from the Orange Tree wiki article) can be found on The Stage website at [2]. Sam Walters told me that he did cut Burney's repetitive text, but probably not enough.

Sam's reaction to the proposed ACE funding cut was neatly summed up in his letter to the Evening Standard - see the Friday edition. I believe it will also be featured this Sunday in the regular British Theatre Guide update. The Orange Tree and the Bush are both getting such high level support from the industry that I suspect their grants will be maintained, but not increased as they might otherwise have reasonably expected given the big hike in the government's contribution to arts funding by ACE.

I am not sure how we can reflect all this on wikipedia. I would not wish to add it to the Orange Tree article, since it is transient information, although I think The Stage link I made as a ref from the Northcott Exeter page is perhaps the best way of tackling it encyclopedically. John Thaxter (talk) 12:38, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


A tag has been placed on Louis Alexandre Raimon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kannie | talk 18:38, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Balloonist.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Balloonist.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Subhash padatik.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Subhash padatik.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Habib Wahid

An article that you have been involved in editing, Habib Wahid, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habib Wahid. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Habib maya.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Habib maya.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:0330280414.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:0330280414.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:De57.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:De57.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Frank Davison

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Frank Davison, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Frank Davison. BlueValour (talk) 05:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

I hope you'll go back and tell us more about Davison and why you admire him. I tried to find a little about him, without great success.Thomas Babbington (talk) 15:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Thomas Babbington

Image:Bronstein.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bronstein.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 08:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tim Clancy (footballer), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Tim Clancy. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:08, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Tim Clancy

Moving pages by copy&paste method destroys article histories and causes copyright violation. Please see Help:Moving a page for more information. Best regards, --PeaceNT (talk) 13:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Tim Clancy (travel writer)

A tag has been placed on Tim Clancy (travel writer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TNX-Man 13:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jhumu Khan

A tag has been placed on Jhumu Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bvlax2005 (talk) 11:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ché Walker

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ché Walker, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CalendarWatcher (talk) 02:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ché Walker

I have nominated Ché Walker, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ché Walker. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. CalendarWatcher (talk) 07:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Birendra Dutta

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Birendra Dutta, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Birendra Dutta seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Birendra Dutta, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Sasha Regan and the Union Theatre

Happy to supply the pic I took for The Stage of Sasha Regan. But as I am not adept at loading pics on wiki, if you let me have your email address I will happily send it to you - the pic is a great deal better than the Stage version would suggest!! Best wishes John Thaxter (talk) 17:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey! You haven't followed up the idea of using my Stage pic of Sasha Regan for the article. I await your email address and promise I will not use it other than to send you the pic! Mine is thaxter@waitrose.com.

RegardsJohn Thaxter (talk)

Possibly unfree File:Chukovsk.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Chukovsk.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:59, 3 January 2009 (UTC) --Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:59, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ana Firmino

A tag has been placed on Ana Firmino requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 11:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Finaçon

A tag has been placed on Finaçon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 12:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)