User talk:Phil Bridger/July 2021 – September 2021

Nomination of Qishuyan railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qishuyan railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qishuyan railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Jeepday (talk) 12:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Heycambry (talk) 15:42, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Pedant" pedantry

A pendant

A pedant

Hehe, I just wanted to point out the irony of a pedant misspelling "pedant". I'd also like to note that the word "litterally" is relevant to the situation on which you were commenting. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 19:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hoist by my own petard. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Worthington-New Haven State Road for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Worthington-New Haven State Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worthington-New Haven State Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:57, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at User talk:usernamekiran § Galgotias College

You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:usernamekiran § Galgotias College. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding! "What is the Best AI model for Content Moderation on Wikipedia?"

Dear @Phil Bridger: Thanks so much for your participation in our discussion post "What is the Best AI model for Content Moderation on Wikipedia?" in Village Pump! Your insights are really appreciated! I wonder if you would have time to engage a bit more with us and other interested editors on this topic? We plan to host an online zoom discussion session soon to invite editors to discuss further with us and with each other -- of course you can turn your camera off if you want :) If you're interested, please get in touch and I will send you (and others) a WhenToMeet link to schedule the session! Thanks so much again for your time! Bobo.03 (talk) 02:01, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brian Silas (Pianist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Silas (Pianist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Silas (Pianist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Thanks for responding! "What is the Best AI model for Content Moderation on Wikipedia?"

Dear @Phil Bridger: Thanks so much for your participation in our discussion post "What is the Best AI model for Content Moderation on Wikipedia?" in Village Pump! Your insights are really appreciated! I wonder if you would have time to engage a bit more with us and other interested editors on this topic? We plan to host an online zoom discussion session soon to invite editors to discuss further with us and with each other -- of course you can turn your camera off if you want :) If you're interested, please get in touch and I will send you (and others) a WhenToMeet link to schedule the session! Thanks so much again for your time!Bobo.03 (talk) 17:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

great wording

To assume that anyone who disagrees with you must be doing so for political reasons can only lead people to think that you are the one editing for political reasons rather than just trying to keep promotion out of Wikipedia. (I'm going to add it to my standard responses) DGG ( talk ) 17:44, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]