User talk:Phrustration

Welcome!

Hello, Phrustration, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Phrustration, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Phrustration! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Phrustration

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Phrustration, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KGirlTrucker81^{talk what I'm been doing} 20:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm Millennium bug. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Phrustration— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Millbug ^talk 20:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm Josepolivares. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to André Gomes and Kévin Gameiro have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Josepolivares (talk) 24 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Your recent editing history at André Gomes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Josepolivares (talk) 24 July 2016 (UTC)

In addition to breaking the rules, you remove links and reliable sources. It is your last warning, turn to reverse, I will report it to an editor.Josepolivares (talk) 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Shut up, you are completely retarded because you keep changing my edit, you started this in the first place, it is all your fault but yet you put the blame on me, I am not any idiot and your persistence has shown how disgusting you are as a person.- Phrustration, 24 July 2016

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User:Josepolivares. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:01, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User:Josepolivares. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Josepolivares, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User:Josepolivares— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:Josepolivares. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:Josepolivares, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Bentogoa (talk) 16:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Widr (talk) 16:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]