User talk:Phuebi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Phuebi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 07:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Whispering 17:16, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Phuebi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering 17:16, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

20:03:39, 13 November 2018 review of draft by Phuebi[edit]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question[edit]

Hello, Phuebi! I'm CASSIOPEIA. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victorina Himeji (December 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Clarityfiend (talk) 07:29, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

Your note in your decline says "and the team does not play in the top-level V.League (Japan)". I'm curious if you have a source for that requirement. Even if that was a mistake in stating a personal preference of yours, and you toss it out, please consider:

My submission has ELEVEN external references. ALL eleven teams who play in V.League Division 1 have a COMBINED TOTAL of ZERO external references. I can only assume that they were accepted for publication because they are in Division 1? They certainly don't meet the requirement of providing secondary reliable sources. I'll add that three of those eleven teams only promoted to the V1 this year but have had wiki pages for years. There is a page for Division 2 team Kashiwa Angel Cross (asking for improvement), but look at that page and tell me my submission is below that level. Please.

I know it's a questionable argument to say "Hey! Mine sucks less than some others", but I think YOU should consider YOUR sources as well:

The page you linked to V.League (Japan) is WRONG, un-sourced and out of date. I've updated as much of the page as I am able to at this time, and I posted a note in the [WikiProject Volleyball] discussion page asking for help and/or guidance to no avail.

I have updated ALL eleven Division 1 Team pages with current rosters, coaches, etc., etc.

I've begun to try and correct the V.Challenge League page as no such thing exists any more. It was when I was correcting the team lists for that page that I thought "hmm, Victoria Himeji doesn't have a page and deserves one", being VERY notable for their Head Coach and General Manager. Anyone with a passing interest in volleyball would know that. They are the ONLY woman's team in either division that is undefeated at this time. I was trying to get ahead of the curve (forgive me that one ... lol)

FYI - the V.League (Japan) page you link to is WRONG. The Japanese V.League is NOT the "top-level volleyball league for both men and women in Japan." It is a League comprising THREE divisions, V1, 2, and 3 for men and V1 and 2 for women. See the Japanese version of the page: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/V.LEAGUE

In other words, I'm not just some Victoria Himeji fanboy trying to sneak a page onto Wikipedia. They are an important and notable team in the V.League. It's part of a long ongoing process I have started. Since there is a page for the Challenge League with a list of teams in each division, why not create a page for the teams listed? That's EXACTLY why ALL eleven V1 teams have pages, isn't it? Certainly they don't meet the requirement of multiple secondary reliable sources. As mentioned ALL eleven V1 team pages have a COMBINED TOTAL of ZERO external references!

If you want to put an end to all the work left for me to try and address because you don't personally think Division 2 teams are worthwhile, so be it. Perhaps you could pass the Draft on to someone who has some volleyball interest or knowledge? Point me in the direction of where to seek additional help, or how to appeal your random, personal (not up to Wikipedia standards) decline?

Thanks for your consideration,

Phuebi (talk) 23:50, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmit it if you wish. Heck, you could even ask somebody from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants#Active reviewers list to review your article.
IMO, the team clearly fails WP:SPORTBASIC (the same as GNG, as far as I can see): being "the subject of multiple published non-trivial secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." (bolding mine) One of your eleven (#6) may or may not qualify. The rest aren't even close. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:29, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I suggest you read Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:32, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, you're right. Obviously someone with the power to publish in 2015 allowed all the V.League stuff to get online. It shouldn't be there. If people want to know about the Japanese V.League they should learn to read Japanese. It is a shame, though, to leave all the inaccurate, incomplete garbage up there. I'm done with it.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victorina Himeji has been accepted[edit]

Victorina Himeji, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 09:14, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 16:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:2019–20 V.League Division 1 Women's has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2019–20 V.League Division 1 Women's. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:51, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Robert McClenon: Thanks for the note. I believe I've done a better job with section headings. Phuebi (talk) 23:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 23:51, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2019–20 V.League Division 1 Women's[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CNMall41 (talk) 19:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Japan V.League Logo 2019-2020.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Japan V.League Logo 2019-2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 18:17, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file was a duplicate of File:V-league-women1-logo.png and that file was older it should be kept.Jonteemil (talk) 18:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jonteemil: I believe this is all because I don't understand Wiki's policies. I can't even make sense of the 5 or 6 messages I just got for this issue. I uploaded V-league-women1-logo.png for 2018–19_V.League_Division_1_Women's. Then I used it when I created 2019–20_V.League_Division_1_Women's and it was flagged for being used in more than one page, so I uploaded Japan_V.League_Logo_2019-2020.png to use in the 2019-2020 page. I don't understand how to do it properly. sitenoise (talk) 20:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jonteemil: I just edited my response because I mis-named the file I uploaded for 2019–20_V.League_Division_1_Women's sitenoise (talk) 20:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see, probably a common problem. The thing is you have to have one fair use rationale per use of the file. So if you want to have the logo in for example three pages you have to have three fair use rationales. See for example File:Hammarby IF logo.svg which has several rationales for each article it is used in. Unfortunately your logo can only be used in 2019–20_V.League_Division_1_Women's and not 2017-18. This is because a criterion of fair use is "minimal use" and to use the logo in each article per season wouldn't be considered minimal. See for example Bundesliga which has a logo but 2019–20 Bundesliga which hasn't got a logo.Jonteemil (talk) 20:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jonteemil: That's cool. Seems fair and sensible that it (if I understand it correctly) be used only in the current season. May I ask what would be the proper way to transfer/reuse/reupload the logo when I create the 2020-2021 season page? sitenoise (talk) 20:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If the logo changes, you can upload the logo to the same file page and update the rationale from the 2019-20 season to the 2020-21 season. If the logo stays the same, just update the rationale at File:V-league-women1-logo.png.Jonteemil (talk) 20:57, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jonteemil: thank you sitenoise (talk) 21:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The page File:Japan V.League Logo 2019-2020.png has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image was an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links were updated.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — JJMC89(T·C) 21:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:2020–21 V.League Division 1 Women's, from its old location at User:Phuebi/2020–21 V.League Division 1 Women's. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055talk - contribs 05:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021–22 V.League Division 1 Women's, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 21:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 V.League Division 1 Women, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saki Nakajima. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurobe AquaFairies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ayano Sato.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]