User talk:Pieeternal257

Welcome!

Hello Pieeternal257!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (Pieeternal257) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started.

Happy editing! - wolf 03:29, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Tim profile pic brickwall 2020 wide v1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tim profile pic brickwall 2020 wide v1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:45, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Timothy Freke has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Timothy Freke. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Timothy Freke (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NAUTHOR for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

Articles other than list articles should not consist primarily of very long lists. See Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. The list of books is too long.

The combination of the lede paragraph and the long list of books reads like an advertisement for his books.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Timothy Freke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Timothy Freke, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pieeternal257! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Timothy Freke has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Timothy Freke. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pieeternal257 (talk) 04:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure why the last submission said that notability did not change since 2015. According to the rules of notability Timothy Frekes coauthorship of a very notorious/famous work "The Jesus Mysteries" should be enough to warrant him a Wiki page of his own. Its almost like the content of that work is being judged in order to not permit its author to not have a page. Let me know what you want me to change. I have looked at other authors in his field with less recognition who have Wikipedia articles of their own, some based on one work.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Timothy Freke (December 1)

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:Timothy Freke|cv=no|reason=bio|details=|reason2=|details2=|comment=This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to [[WP:NAUTHOR}

An article on this author was deleted after a deletion discussion in 2015, which found that the subject is not notable as an author (or otherwise). This draft was declined two weeks ago stating that it does not establish notability. In particular, it does not show that the subject has become notable since 2015. This draft has been resubmitted again without addressing either the concerns of the participants in the AFD or the reviewers. If the author thinks that the subject is notable, then they should explain what notability criterion is satisfied, in AFC comments, or on the talk page of this draft.

This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.]] for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Timothy Freke (December 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft was reviewed on 19 November 2020 and declined, and reviewed again on 1 December 2020 and declined. Both times, it was noted that an article on the subject had already been considered for deletion in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Freke and deleted as not notable. When this draft was declined on 1 December 2020, the reviewer stated that the draft had been declined for notability reasons, and should not be resubmitted without explaining, in an AFC comment or on the draft talk page, what biographical notability criterion was satisfied. The decline stated that minor changes without an explanation would not be sufficient. This draft has been resubmitted with minor changes, a mention of a YouTube presentation in 2019, but without explaining why the subject is notable. This resubmission is contrary to instructions and is tendentious.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Do not resubmit this draft, and do not attempt to resubmit this draft. You may request permission to submit a new draft at Deletion Review; this does not mean that permission will be granted. If a draft is submitted or resubmitted without going to Deletion Review, a topic-ban or partial block may be requested.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timothy Freke

Template:Timothy Freke has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. David Biddulph (talk) 06:37, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020: Please stop trying to get Freke into Wikipedia

User:Pieeternal257, for over a month, your sole intention, as a Wikipedia editor, has been to get an article on Mr. Freke published and live on Wikipedia. What that tells me is that you have no interest in Wikipedia, only in Mr. Freke. This is confirmed by taking a look at the draft you have written. The sourcing is very light, being primarily to an esoteric bookshop and an extremely uncomplimentary book review which, not favorably, compares Freke's book to the one being trashed. On a blog. The book you cite I am not familiar with, but if it's the most solid source you could find, I doubt it can support an entire article. The handwriting is on the wall. Please read it, and abandon your draft before things get any more ridiculous.--Quisqualis (talk) 01:05, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Timothy Freke

Hello, Pieeternal257. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Timothy Freke".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 06:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]