User talk:Pitta Gee Ka Samman

June 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sarah Khan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sarah Khan was changed by Pitta Gee Ka Samman (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918513 on 2018-06-19T08:55:43+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:55, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sarah Khan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TMG^talk 09:22, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Aamina Sheikh. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TMG^talk 08:25, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sarah Khan. TMG^talk 08:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aapka Aakash, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:31, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sarah Khan. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TMG^talk 08:31, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 17:08, 25 June 2018 (UTC)