Jump to content

User talk:Pittwedge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed deletion of Kyoki Roberts[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kyoki Roberts, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

not notable; best claim to fame is being on the board of an organization of about 100 members

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Brianyoumans (talk) 15:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kyoki Roberts[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kyoki Roberts, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyoki Roberts. Thank you. Brianyoumans (talk) 11:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I feel sort of like I'm kicking a kitten here - it is a very nice article. However, I really feel that her accomplishments, as described, do not exceed those of, say, a moderately active Catholic priest or Episcopal minister, and Wikipedia doesn't really want/need to have articles on every clergyman/woman in the world. Well, that's my view; let's see what the folks at AFD have to say. You are welcome to contribute to the discussion there, of course. Once again - well done article! Brianyoumans (talk) 11:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]