User talk:Pixprocessing

March 2022[edit]

Hello Pixprocessing. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Pixprocessing. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pixprocessing|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 14:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website - I have blocked this account. Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a change of username of your current account here. The new username must represent only yourself as an individual and comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you.

Secretlondon (talk) 17:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

We are Pixpro UAB team. We created two articles and submited them. We are not being paid neither directly nor indirectly for our articles. We are an employer and the client - a single Pixpro UAB team.

Please note that Pixpro is a shortened name of Pixprocessing. We tried to create wikipedia user with username Pixpro but our request was canceled. So we registered as Pixprocessing.

Kind regards

Pixpro team Pixprocessing (talk) 14:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pixpro Software (March 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unclear the software or company are notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pixpro Software and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pixpro Software, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 20:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Could you please explain in more details what do you mean by commenting "Unclear ... notable."?

Do we need to choose only one submited article?

Our goal is to have two separate articles. One article is about company: Pixpro UAB. Second article is about software (Pixpro Software) developed by Pixpro UAB.

Kind regards

Pixpro team Pixprocessing (talk) 14:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You will need to change your names, be unblocked and declare your paid status before you can create drafts, but in order for them to be approved,you'll need to show that they're notable, which is not clear based on the sourcing present. Ideally someone unconnected would write about these. Star Mississippi 14:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What names do we need to change? Do we need to change username Pixprocessing?

If Pixpro UAB employee writes artile about Pixpro UAB, do we need to declare our paid status?

By saying "you'll need to show that they're notable", do you mean that we need to provide other refrences about Pixpro Software? Pixprocessing (talk) 14:33, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. You need to use a name that indicates it's one person using the account, for example John at Pixpro. And yes, independent, in depth references that meet WP:ORG, specifically WP:CORPDEPTH. Passing mentions of the company or software are not sufficient. Does that help? Star Mississippi 14:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for answers.

Could you please answer to this question: If Pixpro UAB employee writes artile about Pixpro UAB, do we need to declare our paid status?

How to change our user name? We couldn't find. Pixprocessing (talk) 14:51, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go: Wikipedia:Changing_username after which you can request an unblock.

And yes. You just declare your relationship with the company and paid status per WP:COI and WP:PAID Star Mississippi 15:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pixprocessing! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 20:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Pixpro Software[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Pixpro Software, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VViking_TalkEdits 14:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Pixpro[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Pixpro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jamiebuba (talk) 15:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]