User talk:Piyush2312

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Piyush2312, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Shree ganest temple, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Lakun.patra (talk) 08:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shree ganest temple[edit]

The article Shree ganest temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Contains Original Research

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lakun.patra (talk) 08:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not write Original Research as you wrote "A few years ago Lord Shiva also arose near the temple from same form land". Please add valid references to anything you add to Wikipedia. Thank You. Lakun.patra (talk) 11:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

Misleading edit summaries[edit]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Sidhi_(Lok_Sabha_constituency) has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do.
The edit I mean is here. It is not the only inaccurate summary you have used! 220 of ^Borg 02:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This "Fixed typo, Fixed grammar, Added links" at Deosar, here is a 'classic', and it is wrong. NO typo, NO grammar fix, NO added links. You added (+720)‎ bytes of unsourcd text. The correct summary would be "added content", "expanded", "exp."or even just "+". Strongly suggest you do not keep doing this. 220 of ^Borg 03:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another account?[edit]

Are you connected to Chaturvedipiyush23 (talk · contribs) in any way? Similar user name no? See WP: Multiple accounts - 220 of ^Borg 03:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ganesh Temple, Deosar[edit]

The article Ganesh Temple, Deosar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to fail WP:GNG. It doesn't refer to reliable sources, and seems to just represent a non-notable local temple.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BDD (talk) 14:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]