User talk:Pkrembs

Would you care to elaborate as to why you decided to put a tag on the People's Park article disputing its neutrality. Over the past year a lot of effort has gone into making the article more neutral, and for many months no one has commented that they found it biased.

I assume you have your reasons. If you will state them I will attempt to address whatever issues you raise. Thanks. Founders4 02:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas DiLorenzo[edit]

Starting a section with the phrase "It can be argued that..." implies that we, as Wikipedia editors, are making up this criticism. That is certainly not the implication we want to make. It'd be much better tt write that "Notable critic X has argued that..." We want to verifiably summarize reliable source using the neutral point of view rather than creating original criticisms (no matter how valid). I'm going to remove the material you added, but feel free to summarize any one who has said the same thing. -Will Beback · † · 00:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]