User talk:Plaba123/Archive 1

Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Plaba123/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Plaba123/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering 05:50, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Plaba123, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering 05:50, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blitz Cipher (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MadeYourReadThis was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blitz Cipher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Blitz Cipher, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MadeYourReadThis (talk) 13:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Revision on opioid use disorder

Hello. I added the differential because merely using opioids doesn't automatically mean someone has a mental disorder. It is a huge pet peeve of mine when people assume all stigmatized drug users have a substance use disorder, or that all multiples have dissociative identity disorder, or that all trans people have gender dysphoria, or that all shy people have social anxiety disorder. Clinically significant distress or impairment plus meeting very specific criteria is required because otherwise, these diagnoses would just be tools of marginalizing minority groups.

I have sources for the existence of nondisordered opioid users:

• Section: Does Anyone on Opioids Have Opioid Use Disorder?

• Nonproblematic "Illegal" Drug Use

CommuniqueNew2 (talk) 20:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

You're Right. I was just trying to fight vandalism, and I made a false positive.Plaba123 (talk) 14:08, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

It's okay. :) CommuniqueNew2 (talk) 21:13, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Reverting Vandalism

Hi, could you please leave warnings on user's talkpages whenever you are reverting vandalism? A list of warnings are seen here. Thank you. //nepaxt 02:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Okay, thanks.Plaba123 (talk) 02:31, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

FAMS

Hi, did you check this edit you reverted before you saved it? It needs fixing. FYI - ^theWOLFchild 02:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Nope. I was in anti-vandalism mode and that one slipped right past me. Thanks Plaba123 (talk) 02:52, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Zina Bash

Thanks for the edit on Zina Bash. Trying to push this onto Talk to avoid a back-and-forth. Your thoughts welcome.Bjhillis (talk) 01:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for telling me. Usually an IP user calling people retarded and removing controversial content is a sign of vandalism, and I have treated that edit as such. That type of user will probably not use the talk page, so a warning there would be useless. Tell me if you disagree. Plaba123 (talk) 01:25, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Rollback

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 13:41, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

@Gilliam:Thank you very much!

Plaba123 (talk) 13:44, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Huggle

Hi Plaba123, I see you are reverting lots of vandalism edits, but without leaving warning messages on user talk pages. Might I suggest you have a look at wp:Huggle? This is a very handy tool to revert vandalism and leave appropriate messages of increasing severity, and even reporting at wp:AIV, all with one single click. All you need is rollback, and I see that you already have it, so you can just install it and try it out. Good luck! - DVdm (talk) 14:13, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

@DVdm: Ok. I'll have a look at it. Plaba123 (talk) 14:18, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Some examples: When ip 205.178.106.209 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) already had a level 2 warning on their talk page, this revert and this level 3 warning, took one click (together). Same for this revert and this final level 4 warning. Then, finally, another single click resulted in this revert and this report at wp:AIV with no further warning. Six edits with 3 clicks . After that, the IP was blocked by an administrator. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 14:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

@DVdm: Wow! I'm downloading it now for sure. Plaba123 (talk) 14:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Ok, but do be careful... this is powerful, almost explosive stuff . If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask! - DVdm (talk) 14:37, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

@DVdm: Don't worry; I will be careful. Trust me . Thanks for the recommendation. Plaba123 (talk) 14:46, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry

Hi, Plaba123, I'm very sorry. I blocked you indefinitely by mistake. What happened was that you tried to Huggle-revert vandalism on Bobby Hosea, but what actually ended up getting reverted was Cluebot's reversion of the vandalism, meaning your edit actually restored the vandalism. I'm quite sure on second glance that that was a completely honest mistake, but when I first looked at it, I thought that it was a sock of the original vandal restoring the vandalism, and blocked accordingly. I was way too quick on the trigger, and I'm very sorry for it. :( I've noted the fact in the block log. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 14:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Hehe, Plaba, I told you... powerful, almost explosive . - DVdm (talk) 14:17, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

And I didn't listen...

@Writ Keeper: No worries at all. I didn't even notice it. Plaba123 (talk) 14:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Ed Westwick

Fifty-three words of explanation and all you have to say whilst re-introducing a BLP violation is 'reverted edits by x'. Please be more careful. Please consider how you would phrase your explanation for reversions. @Phenolla:. Thanks. Not amused, -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 06:52, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@Zzuuzz: I am very sorry. I'll make sure to check the edit explanation and not let this happen again. Plaba123 (talk) 12:57, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

.

Sorry, couldn't resist - DVdm (talk) 14:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Kevin B. MacDonald

You are mistaken in your reversion of my edit, the info comes from the ref already cited, and it is common knowledge that the subject is a self-proclaimed anti-semite. I am undoing, please discuss on the article talk page if you have an issue. 216.158.183.19 (talk) 21:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Go ahead. Plaba123 (talk) 21:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Emmett Cleary

If it looks like I reverted you for vandalism, I had to restore a good version because Emmett Cleary was getting bum-rushed by vandals. James1011R (talk, contribs) 02:51, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

@James1011R: Thanks for doing that, actually. Plaba123 (talk) 02:54, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

hi

sup — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dariyman (talk • contribs) 20:57, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

@Dariyman: I reverted your edits because they were not helpful. In fact, they looked like vandalism, and reverting vandalism is what I do on Wikipedia. Plaba123 (talk) 21:54, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Apologies

I think it might have been my fault that your userspace draft article on Draft:Miracle Hill Ministries was moved to what we call 'draftspace' and then got moved back again shortly afterwards. We were checking one or two recent moves that had been made to sandbox pages, trying to work out whether or not whether it was appropriate or if it was what the user actually wanted. In your case (based upon your recent question at the (WP:Teahouse) I didn't think you did, so I asked Theroadislong to move it back again. But I think we both messed up there a bit at different points, so I'm really sorry you had to ask them to reinstate it, and for any confusion caused. I'm also very grateful to Justlettersandnumbers who seems to have sorted things out for us earlier today. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 22:44, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

@Nick Moyes: No worries! Thank you for being so open. Plaba123 (talk) 22:59, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Please don't fix articles with bad translations.

Hey - just a lighthearted observation about the wording on your user page...

...I really hope you'll actually fix those articles with good translations! Cheers Nick Moyes (talk) 22:24, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Sounds like a misplaced modifier . I have to update that page anyway... Plaba123 (talk) 00:53, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Philippine Normal University

Hello. I was just wondering why you reverted my edits about PNU. Please check the sources and discuss here if you disagree. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.34.79.54 (talk) 00:10, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, reverted. Plaba123 (talk) 00:15, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Plaba123! You created a thread called Article Review at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 21 October 2018 (UTC)