Jump to content

User talk:Plant Stress Doctor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I guess this means that the article was deleted and can not be recovered? I guess I have to start from scratch?


AfC notification: Draft:Chloroplast migration has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chloroplast migration. Thanks! Reventtalk 23:52, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: [[Draft:Chloroplast migration|Chloroplast Plant Stress Doctor (talk) 18:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC)migration]] (September 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

Reventtalk 02:59, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Plant Stress Doctor, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reventtalk 02:59, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Opti-Sciences Inc (March 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 03:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Opti-Sciences Inc has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Opti-Sciences Inc. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Opti-Sciences Inc (March 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Opti-Sciences Inc has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Opti-Sciences Inc. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:25, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Opti-Sciences Inc (March 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 00:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chloroplast migration (March 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 01:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 28 March

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk questions

[edit]

You have responses to both of them.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chloroplast migration (April 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Chloroplast migration has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chloroplast migration. Thanks! Onel5969 TT me 13:30, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chloroplast migration (May 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Omni Flames was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Omni Flames let's talk about it 07:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chloroplast migration (July 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 18:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Plant Stress Doctor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 16:59, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please visit....

[edit]

Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Optisci_and_ADC_Bioscientific. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 17:24, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also please carefully read WP:UNDUE and WP:NOTJOURNAL. The vast majority of readers visiting photosynthesis are interested in why photosynthetic efficiency is important, not how to measure it. Boghog (talk) 16:57, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Steveadcuk, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

KATMAKROFAN (talk) 19:23, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Opti-Sciences Inc

[edit]

Hello, Plant Stress Doctor. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Opti-Sciences Inc".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 13:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chloroplast migration

[edit]

Hello, Plant Stress Doctor. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Chloroplast migration".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 04:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]