User talk:Plantation1926
|
August 2012
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Eluzé Living, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 13:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jamie McDonnell-Griffiths
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jamie McDonnell-Griffiths requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JetBlast (talk) 14:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Logo of EL.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Logo of EL.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
You may have noticed that I have reverted your attempts to edit the Runcorn article. This was for two reasons: (1) your edits had completely messed up the end of the article and (2) I suspect that the individual concerned did not satisfy Wikipedia's requirements for notability (and that is confirmed by the messages above). Indeed I have my doubts about the notability of Eluzé Living. I do hope that you are not Jamie McDonnell, because if you are, your contributions to Wikipedia are completely unacceptable, being a form of advertising. If you reply to this message, please do so here, as I have added you to my watchlist. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 16:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Eluzé Living for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eluzé Living is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eluzé Living until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:46, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Removing AfD template
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Eluzé Living. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 18:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Eluzé Living Logo.png listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eluzé Living Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 23:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
