User talk:Plazmid

Proposed deletion of La Mancha Negra[edit]

Hello, Plazmid. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, La Mancha Negra, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 11:14, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Creepy Gnome (May 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Creepy Gnome and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Plazmid, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Usernamekiran (AWB). I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to La Mancha Negra— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —usernamekiran(talk) 20:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at User talk:Usernamekiran/Archive 9#La Mancha Negra page[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Usernamekiran/Archive 9#La Mancha Negra page. —usernamekiran(talk) 08:40, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Madgy Figgy's Chair[edit]

The article Madgy Figgy's Chair has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is not encyclopedic. It makes no mention of any basis for notability, and says nothing about reliable sources have written.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Apollo 10 turd[edit]

The article Apollo 10 turd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This stub is not encyclopedic, and gives no indication of why it is notable or what reliable sources have reported. If it is verifiable, it may be appropriate to add to Apollo 10, except that it might be considered trivia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apollo 10 turd moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Apollo 10 turd, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:34, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

question: does prrof from a transcript from NASA themselves not qualify as notifiable proof? I acknowledge the page needs work and would need help from other coolaborators. but I was assuiming that the transcript from NASA would be enough prrof of its existance of it being true and verifiable - Plazmid

AfC notification: Draft:Apollo 10 turd has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Apollo 10 turd. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Plazmid! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Apollo 10 Turd, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Madgy Figgy's Chair[edit]

Hello, Plazmid,

Thank you for creating Madgy Figgy's Chair.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

While the article has a section for references, these are unconnected to the assertions made in the article. Statements need to be capable of verification via substantial coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources - ideally by the use of footnotes/inline citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 18:12, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey you’re the only person that’s taking this serious and actually giving me a chance , how do I got about making this happen ? I am able to find interesting topics. Like a I created La Mancha Negra , which is a wiki Page (look it up) but I needed help to create it. Could you help me ? Plazmid 21:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Madgy Figgy's Chair moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Madgy Figgy's Chair, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul W (talk) 18:12, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Apollo 10 turd[edit]

Hello, Plazmid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Apollo 10 turd, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Apollo 10 turd[edit]

Hello, Plazmid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Apollo 10 turd".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]