User talk:Plentifuls

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Plentifuls (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My friend edits here. He said it doesn't really matter what your first few edits are; you're unlikely to do anything that can really get you in trouble.

Decline reason:

Your friend was mistaken. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

:Is that so? Did your friend also tell you to repeatedly post graphic images on someone's user talk page, or was that your own initiative? Regardless, why would you ever think doing so would be remotely acceptable, much less a good way to start? – Luna Santin (talk) 00:40, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That part was my own initiative. Because I thought I might as well try something like that. Now I have a pretty good idea of how to post images!

I see. Why did you choose that particular image? That particular page? Why did you keep adding it, even after being reverted several times? – Luna Santin (talk) 00:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Plentifuls (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Intention to contribute to encyclopedia. Cannot contribute whilst blocked. Thank you. Wish to edit Distraction (game show) to reword early sentence: replace "shown" with "aired".

Decline reason:

No, we don't generally unblock vandals. That's how we reduce vandalism, you see. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Plentifuls (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Test editing complete. Realization of error complete.

Decline reason:

After what you posted dozen of times on various articles and user talk pages? I see no reason to believe that you were just "testing" there. — Metros (talk) 23:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Nell Gwynne (operetta) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pontifical Roman Athenaeum S. Apollinare[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Pontifical Roman Athenaeum S. Apollinare, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Pontifical Roman Athenaeum S. Apollinare is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Pontifical Roman Athenaeum S. Apollinare, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]