User talk:Poahcon
Poahcon
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ralph Thomas Scurfield, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. The article already has a ridiculously self-aggrandizing tone with no balance whatsoever. If you'd like to help to improve it, I suggest addressing those issues rather than removing the few critical statements. —INTRIGUEBLUE (talk|contribs) 13:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- I am improving the quality of the article by fighting vandalism and by using reliable sources. The information that I removed (and you restored) were false statements that are not supported any source. Further, the reference I removed (a lawyer's advertisement website) is not a reliable source as defined by policy at WP:RELIABLE and it did not did not support the preceding content in the article. I suggest that before you revert someone else's good faith edits you first check to confirm that the content you are restoring is verified by reliable sources. Poahcon (talk) 23:02, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm gratified that you feel so passionately about the quality of the article. I do hope you will put your boundless energy to work in helping me to improve its quality. I'll respond to your specific concerns on the article's talk page. —INTRIGUEBLUE (talk|contribs) 02:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC)