User talk:Poetwhofailstoknowit

Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad you want to get involved, but I'm afraid there's a problem with the article you created, Schuminweb.com. It did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Don't feel too badly; lots of people have a little trouble when creating their first article. You might find it useful to read Your First Article for some good advice about starting to create articles on Wikipedia. Two important rules of thumb are: Avoid writing about yourself, your business, your family and friends, or your web page, and avoid writing about anything that hasn't been written about in reliable sources like books, newspapers, and magazines. Anyway, don't be discouraged. I've deleted the article you created, and feel free to ask me if you have any more questions. If I've made a mistake, and this article really is about a subject that meets the notability criteria, then please let me know my leaving me a message and links to at least three newspaper articles, magazine articles, or books that have been written about the subject, and I'll be glad to undelete it, and even add the sources so no other patroller makes the same mistake. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:35, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Listen to her politely formulated warning, I've heard that tone before right before I was blocked. take her help, you will not win this battle, try and remember why we're here to make a credible entry, and to be credible we need sources. I'll even help if you need help adding your sources. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider this a final warning. The next time you violate the rules of basic good manners, you will be blocked from further edits. There is no need to be rude; you already know that I am ready to restore the article and waiting only for some information I need from you. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help me help you. What are you writing about? I like to research maybe I can help you find reliable sources. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He's writing about a web site called Schuminweb.com, if that helps. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poet go to my talkpage, leave fisher be for the moment and letme know what your aim is and i'll tart looking into the website. Cmon let's avoid the block and if Fisher is frustrating you I'll step in and help you if I can. Let me know because i'm only willing to help if you're willing to be helped. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remember to be civil there even about other users though, many peolle are waching my page and could bring unwanted further scrutiny. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In case you're curious, Hell, I don't actually watch your talk page very closely anymore. I did for a few days after your block expired, but you seemed to have gotten the hang of things, so I wandered away. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:57, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I was a bit, however I kinda liked the watching though because it DID help me learn a few other things about templating and how to react to things better. You can't understand how dumb i felt when i finally hit the light switch. My settings monitor every page I edit though. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:59, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, your talk page is still on my watchlist; I just don't usually bother to click on it. I'd probably notice if someone was using "FisherQueen eats babies" edit summaries. :) -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incidently you don't eat babies? I thought all Sysops had to do that by pre-req to join. Lol, good thing to know. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We only have to eat a baby when we become administrators; after that, the baby-eating is purely optional. We do have to sacrifice a she-goat to the devil every time we block our hundredth person, but that's fun. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good thing I ain't a goat roper then or we'd have further problems. I guess when or if Poet contacts me I'll invovle myself further. Until then I have work on my own articles. I've made 3 so far. Pueblo Central High School Runyon Lake and Pueblo Lake State Park check them out when you have an oppurtunity. They all have references but any help on improvements is always good. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:08, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Try to remember[edit]

I understand you're upset right right now try to leave off the anon insults though. We'll pretend fisher doesn't exist until we get our sources. After that we will have aauthored a successful article.Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:11, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also when first constructing an article keep a copy on your user page. It's ideal to start that way until you have sources to avoid deleting. Helps save your work Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:12, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ERROR: Please enter the username parameter when using the {{Talkback}} template - thus {{Talkback|<username>}}.

TAKE THE BREAK!!!!![edit]

I've done almost word for word what you did and I have to tell you she is trying hard not to take action right now. take a break cool down then message me with your page ideas and we'll find a way to make it work. You do not realize how disrupting this looks to otehr editors. I dId this and it is hard to regain your bonafides after this. Agree or Not right now the cussing and ranting only makes it disruption. You want to contribute right? If you get blocked you can't, and I don't want to see you blocked especially not for something you care for. Let's play within their rules and get it included.Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for poor manners. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:28, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Poetwhofailstoknowit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Here, all I said was that she was a carpet muching whore. Come on guys, we all have cocks surely?

Decline reason:

How nice of you; I assume you're just trying to be fashionably misogynistic? Any more of this and you won't be able to even edit your talk page. Acroterion _(talk) 17:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2009[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:HellinaBucket, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. [1] Wuhwuzdat (talk) 17:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to talk with this user.[edit]

This person would be idealy suited to finding suitable refere4nces for your article. be careful though. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Schuminweb#Major_writing_and.2For_cleanup Hell in a Bucket (talk) 18:13, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]