Jump to content

User talk:Pogrump

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Pogrump! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...) 14:42, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

The policy I found is linked to by what she was calling the right policy, so both apply, and the major problems in the lead remain anyway.

[edit]
  1. Not a policy. Style-Guidelines are guides to how we should handle things.
  2. Both cannot apply, since one of them contradicts the other. Articles != Lists with regards to structure (style) which should be obvious.
  3. The inline link you pointed out, is not a directional link, but a descriptive link.
  4. And i'm male.
  5. Please research a bit on how other lists are structured before assuming knowledge ;-) Category:Lists is a nested list of all of WP's lists.

--Kim D. Petersen (talk) 23:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In my view, the text of the two can be reasonably interpreted either way and is therefore ambiguous. I believe the only way to make progress is with draft text and would like to urge you both to not bog down arguing which interpretation of the ambiguity is "right". NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 01:03, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]