User talk:Pointn
Regarding addition of unsourced content[edit]
Hello, you have been continuously adding unsourced content on Wikipedia page of Rukmini. Please once go through the Wikipedia guidelines regarding the list of reliable source. You have to provide reference according to those guidelines to support your edit. Random blogs cannot be considered as a reliable source. Also, the content you are adding cannot be termed as "minor edit". Check WP:RS and WP:MINOR for better understanding. Thanks. Kridha (talk) 12:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:NoticeBoard[edit]
This is to inform you that I have reported the recent incident of edit warring on wikipage of Rukmini on Wikipedia incident noticeboard.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kridha (talk) 03:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Unable to make any contribution because of you[edit]
What reliable source is needed to add image?? Image is added form temples which are famous locally How can be source added to them??
Rukmini is not famous in whole India But she is famous regionally and locally in PANDHARPUR , Maharashtra,, tamilnadu, Andhra and even in dwaraka she is like mother to Dwaraka people.. Lot of abhangas are attributed to her by famous warkari saints as tukaram Which address her as adhyashakti , Mother of universe Krishna being father .. she is goddess of all good virtues and qualities, fortune ( mentioned in srimad Bhagavad itself)) but these abhangas are in Marathi language and no English translation available so not able to attach "" reliable source"" that doesn't mean she is mere wife and servent There are lot of goddess like this in India they are so much venerated locally but you are making it impossible to develop article" rukmi ni" Pointn (talk) 05:40, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Unable to add any content to Rukmini because of user."kridha" Pointn (talk) 05:41, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Welcome![edit]
Welcome!
Hello, Pointn, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Rukmini, show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.
Did you know that ...
- ...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
- ...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
- ...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
- ...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
- ...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process – at least until you get the hang of things?
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- Manual of Style
Images[edit]
Recently, you have been changing lead images of multiple pages. But all those images which are uploaded by you or your another account are lacking Metadata in wikimedia commons. There is no information about camera manufacturer, camera name, original timing of image, focal length of lens, shutter speed etc which makes your image suspicious as they are probably been taken from internet and are uploaded by you under the tag "Own work". Those image might get deleted if no proper information regarding those image is being shared by uploader on Wikimedia. For your reference, check the below image and see how the metadata information automatically gets uploaded when it is clicked by the uploader himself.
So, kindly upload original and authenticated image which has complete metadata shared on Wikimedia commons. Thanks. Kridha (talk) 10:30, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
June 2022[edit]
Hi Pointn! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Sita several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Sita, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 06:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
ARBIPA sanctions alert[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Kautilya3 (talk) 06:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- You need to stop WP:edit warring at Sita. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)