User talk:Pontos92

This is Pontos92's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pontos92 (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pontos92 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pontos92, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī (^talk) 12:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pontos92! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ─ The Aafī (^talk) 12:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello The Aafi,

I understand the need for meeting strict criteria in order to publish and spread information on Wiki. However, the page I have created has been rejected on account of it being semi-professional, when it remains 1 of 2 teams from it’s competition without a Wiki page.

I have reviewed the pages of not only those in the same competition, but of those higher on the nations league pyramid. The content I have put together is correctly referenced and cites reputable publishers, both of which are absent for the pages of clubs presently on Wikipedia.

I kindly ask for this page to be reconsidered for publishing. If there is anything I can do to help increase the chance of this, please let me know.

Thank you.

Kind regards,

Pontos92 Pontos92 (talk) 13:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pontic Greeks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anatolian Greeks. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pontian Eagles SC (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 4thfile4thrank was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pontian Eagles SC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pontian Eagles SC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

4thfile4thrank (talk) 00:24, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pontian Eagles SC (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Kashmorwiki were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a semi professional club. So fails WP:FOOTY

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pontian Eagles SC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pontian Eagles SC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 06:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kichu,

I understand the need for meeting strict criteria in order to publish and spread information on Wiki. However, the page I have created has been rejected on account of it being semi-professional, when it remains 1 of 2 teams from it’s competition without a Wiki page.

I have reviewed the pages of not only those in the same competition, but of those higher on the nations league pyramid. The content I have put together is correctly referenced and cites reputable publishers, both of which are absent for the pages of clubs presently on Wikipedia.

I kindly ask for this page to be reconsidered for publishing. If there is anything I can do to help increase the chance of this, please let me know.

Thank you.

Kind regards,

Pontos92 Pontos92 (talk) 13:58, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pontic Greeks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olympic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pontian Eagles SC (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:FOOTY

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pontian Eagles SC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pontian Eagles SC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 14:27, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pontian Eagles SC

Hello, Pontos92. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pontian Eagles SC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pontian Eagles SC

Hello, Pontos92. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pontian Eagles SC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pontian Eagles SC

Hello, Pontos92. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pontian Eagles SC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:01, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]