User talk:Poojjan ccresta

Welcome!

Hello, Poojjan ccresta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Make my own wikipedia, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BiH (talk) 06:19, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Make my own wikipedia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BiH (talk) 06:19, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Demographics of Nepal has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Demographics of Nepal was changed by Poojjan ccresta (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92453 on 2014-08-02T06:40:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:40, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nepalese people of Indian ancestry with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:51, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 06:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Nepalese people of Indian ancestry, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Nepalese people of Indian ancestry was changed by Poojjan ccresta (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850057 on 2014-08-02T06:58:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:58, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pujan Shrestha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pujan Shrestha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 07:19, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here hi,please read my recent talk in my talk page ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 07:23, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Poojjan ccresta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

Per below; no reason given for unblock. Kuru (talk) 11:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

plz,unblock me.The reason for unblock has already given below by me.Poojjan ccresta (talk) 11:29, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Attention

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

May I have your attention please?I abbused at most 4 accounts but not 35 and in like that way as it is claimed.Please,unblock me or at least remove those all sock puppets that doesn't belong to me at all.Here,I see wikipedia has failed in confirming sock puppets.

Besides socking, You also have managed to exceed the last warning of vandalism, which makes the reason for your indefinite block. You may want to use the {{unblock}} template mentioned above to appeal the block (Your edit above did not work. You need to copy it into the editing interface). Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 11:05, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Poojjan ccresta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't abbuse so much mulltiple accounts and like that way as it is claimed.I abbused only 4 accounts.Please,Unblock me.I assure you I will never vandalise the wikipedia again.

Decline reason:

From your contribution history, I see no evidence that unblocking you would be of any benefit to this project. Kinu ^t/_c 03:07, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Poojjan ccresta, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

shivam (t) 16:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]