User talk:Postaire

--Postaire (talk) 10:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Postaire, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Pierre Corvol, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 18:43, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I can’t change the text of this file because i have no access to the « edit » function but only to « edit source ». What can I do? Thanks and best regards,--Postaire (talk) 10:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pierre Corvol[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pierre Corvol requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 18:43, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

advice[edit]

I have been working here for 12 years primarily screening new articles, especially biographies of scientists. I think I can help you avoid some of the difficulties yo have unfortunately been running into from improper reviewing. .

In starting an article, it is in practice a good idea to add a reference at the very first edit. It should be enough if you add them quickly, but the way articles are reviewed here, they are often seen first by reviewers who make no allowances for the incomplete state, even if it is just the next minute after starting. (They are not following Deletion Policy correctly if they immediately list it for deletion, but they do it anyway, & I have found that if they are not a beginner but set in their ways, there's no likelihood of trying to get them to do otherwise). And then there are some administrators here who simply delete everything listed for speedy deletion without evaluating it. (They are not properly following deletion Policy either, but there's usually no point in trying to tell them). The only safe thing to do is to have at least one reference at hand that proves the main point of notability , and add it as part of the first edit. It's not supposed to be that way, and I and the great majority of admins will stop every such deletion we are aware of, or undelete it if it has been wrongly deleted, but it's better not to have that problem.

In translating articles, it is absolutely essential that you use an edit summary at the very first edit saying what you are translating from . (This should then be expanded into more detail as explained at WP:COPYWITHIN). Most sensible reviewers and admins will simply add the statement if the article is listed for deletion as a copyvio, but there are a few who are over-literal. It's essentially hopeless to explain to them why it is not good practice to do that.

In translating articles from the frWP and deWP, there is generally a problem with references, since they do it differently. Ultimately, each reference will need to be rewritten according to our practice, and some way found for dealing with the general references they use in situations where we would use specific references. It is sometimes a good idea to simply copy paste the reference section from the page as it appears, and clean it up later.

Please keep up the good work. I do not unfortunately have time to check each article as you write it to make sure it isn't deleted, but if you do run into difficulties, please notify me on my talk page and I will try to deal with it.I know how to do it without getting into a confrontation. DGG ( talk ) 04:55, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please note our manner of organizing a page. Look at the way I reorganized Corval. We put the awards at the end. DGG ( talk ) 05:06, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-François Bach - translation?[edit]

Hey! Thanks for creating Jean-François Bach, but I just wanted to ask if it is a translation of the French article of the same name? If so (just like has been said in the message above) you must state this at the article - please see the information on this at the following pages: Wikipedia:Translation#License requirements; WP:TFOLWP. In the future, you may find using the Content Translation tool useful, as this automatically attributes the translation. Si vous avez besoin d'un traduction - ou vous voudriez parler en français, n'hésitez pas de m'envoyer un message ici (if you need a translation - or you would like to talk in French, don't hesitate to send me a message here). Merci! Seagull123 Φ 17:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour seagull123, la notice Wikipédia en anglais de Jean-François Bach est bien une traduction de sa fiche française. Je n'ai pas bien compris ce que je dois faire pour le signifier. Pouvez vous m'aider ? Cordialement,--Postaire (talk) 08:04, 24 July 2019 (UTC) --Postaire (talk) 08:19, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pierre Braunstein, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rochester and Leopoldina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I changed the mistakes. Thanks. Best regards--Postaire (talk) 14:34, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Margaret Buckingham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ERC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patrick Huerre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alert![edit]

It is absolutely required that when you translate a page from another Wikipedia into the English Wikipedia, that you indicate this, preferably both on the article itself, usually after the references section, and in the edit summary. Preferably, this should indicate not just the article title, but also specific vesion ID of the original, so that it is perfectly clear just what has been used. You asked above how to do it. Just add the text, along with the link.

This is not optional. At enWP, it is considered a copyright violation, and pages lacking this are very likely to be deleted unless someone adds the attribution. As a reviewing administrator, I will do it when I see it, but I cannot and do not see everything.

Please also make the interwiki link, using the "Add link" tool in the bottom of the right hand margin after the page is created. Otherwise, someone else will have to do it for you. This is your responsibility.

(And, as I pointed out above, you need to change links to our style. You need to at least make the link to the enWP articles for the French Academy of Sciences and other institutions. You also need to give dates of his degrees ., and we do not accept vague sentences like "Called to teach in various places, including Europe, the United States, Latin America and China," Give the permanent positions specifically, andi ncate those that are visiting.

The copyright matter in particular is considered quite serious here, and I must ask you for your assurances that you will do this for all articles that you translate. '' DGG' ( talk ) 01:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have taken absolutely no notice of the advice you have been given. When you translate text from a foreign language Wikipedia you must provide attribution to the original authors in your edit summary or on the page, and add a translation tag to the talk page, as I have done for Pierre Encrenaz. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please add translation templates to the talk pages of the other articles you have created by translation. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Soyez plus précis svp quand vous écrivez "Please add translation templates to the talk pages of the other articles you have created by translation". Que dois je faire exactement. Je ne comprends pas. Merci--Postaire (talk) 08:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an example of one I added myself. {{Translated|fr|François Forget}}. You can add this template to the talk page of articles you translate, just changing "François Forget" to the title of the article you have translated. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Postaire

Thank you for creating André Sentenac.

User:Lopifalko, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

All the sources are from employers, or are academic papers. This article needs multiple independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lopifalko}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lopifalko (talk) 15:44, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Lavorel moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Sandra Lavorel, has been moved to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

You have, once again, failed to credit the source, and to conform to the English wiki's standards for biographies. See Template:Biography for a model. Cabayi (talk) 10:48, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Guillaumont moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Robert Guillaumont, ... You know what's wrong. ~~You haven't credited the French original which deprives the french contributors of the credit they deserve for their work.~~ You haven't converted any of the French templates to their English equivalents ({{Lien web}} -> {{Cite web}}). You've left French style quotes « » in the article instead of using English style quotes "". References come after punctuation. There's no References section. The other article I moved to draft had few inline citations WP:INCITE, and put every mention of the subject's name into bold. Please, please, please start with Drafts and make them good before moving them to mainspace. Even better, use the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process. Cabayi (talk) 11:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to create article on enwiki using translations from the French wiki without giving credit to the French original you are likely to be blocked. The French contributors are entitled to credit for their work. You are stealing their effort. There is far more difference between the French wiki and the English wiki than just the language. It would be far better if you created your translations in Draft, got some help from the relevant projects to bring the draft up to standard, and used the Articles for Creation process. I hope that helps.

Excuse the Google translation...

Si vous continuez à créer un article sur enwiki en utilisant des traductions du wiki français sans accorder de crédit à l'original français, vous risquez d'être bloqué. Les contributeurs français ont droit à un crédit pour leur travail. Vous volez leur effort. Il y a beaucoup plus de différence entre le wiki français et le wiki anglais que juste la langue. Il serait préférable que vous créiez vos traductions dans Draft, que vous obteniez de l'aide des projets concernés pour mettre le projet à niveau et que vous utilisiez le processus Articles pour la création. J'espère que ça aide. Cabayi (talk) 11:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I expected to see credit given in your initial edit summary on the page's history, not on the talk page. My mistake, you have done what was required.

Je m'attendais à voir un crédit donné dans votre résumé de modification initial sur l'historique de la page, pas sur la page de discussion. Mon erreur, vous avez fait ce qui était nécessaire. Cabayi (talk) 11:41, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Pouvez vous restituer la fiche anglaise de Robert Guillaumont ? Hello, Can you restore Robert Guillaumont's English file? Thanks --Postaire (talk) 11:48, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It hasn't been deleted, just moved - Draft:Robert Guillaumont. Cabayi (talk) 12:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pourquoi le laisser en draft ? Il est fini et c'est moi qui avait rédigé la version française. Why leave it in draft? It is finished and I was the one who wrote the French version. Merci. Thanks --Postaire (talk) 13:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem again with Eva Pebay-Peyroula. I have enough French to understand the fr.wp article, but I'm going to put you straight about this: if you can't translate French Wikipedia articles into idiomatic English, they are all going to be draft-ified. Dude, if you keep this up, you are gonna find your ass blocked. And this doesn't mean restrictions on your donkey. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:50, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Guillaumont has been accepted[edit]

Robert Guillaumont, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot!

Jean-Marc Egly moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Jean-Marc Egly, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 06:58, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is a translation of the french article.

Edgardo D. Carosella moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Edgardo D. Carosella, does not have enough third party sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 23:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Advice[edit]

The English WP is not the same as the French WP. This applies especially to biographies of living people, where we have a rule that all information must be referenced. For bios of scientists, such as you have been doing, this means more specifically:

the basic plain facts of the persons life --birth, education, spositions held -- can be taken from their official CV, but this needs to be specifically cited as a reference.
The books and papers they have written can be sourced by their publication information. For books, this can be done explicitly by giving the ISBN. For journal articles, it's done by giving the link to the online version.
Awards can if necessary also be sourced to the CV, but if at all possible they should be referenced by a third-party source. This is usually possible, because announcements of awards are generally published.
Everything else must have a third-party independent reliable source. This especially applies to judgments of quality or importance or significance of their work.
Material that can not be sourced must be removed.

In addition, it is our practice that we do not include all the papers of an individual. We do include all their published books. But we include only the most important papers, which is normally shown by the papers having the highest citations, usually by Google, though Scopus or WebofScience is also fine. We usually include 3 to 5 papers. There can sometimes be occasion to cite others in the discussions of their work. DGG ( talk ) 23:46, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Didier Vincent moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Jean-Didier Vincent, does not have third party sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 23:47, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is a translation of the french article.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandra Lavorel has been accepted[edit]

Sandra Lavorel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 22:20, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Wikipedia Google book cite[edit]

Hi This may be of help: [1] All you do is plug in a google book cite url, select the today button and it will create a proper ref from a google book URL. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 10:04, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Postaire. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Éric Postaire, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 19:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Dujon[edit]

I did considerable cleanup of this article, including fixing the nonidiomatic translations of various phrases and positions. You really should be able to do this yourself. There are two key items of information miswisng: is he currently retired--what sort of emeritus position does he now have; and, what is the title and publisher of his popular science book. DGG ( talk ) 10:20, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maxime Schwartz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Order of the Lion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jean-François Bach[edit]

Hello, Postaire. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jean-François Bach".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 22:59, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean-Marc Egly has been accepted[edit]

Jean-Marc Egly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 09:43, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Alain Israël[edit]

Hello, Postaire,

Thank you for creating Alain Israël.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi thanks for creating this article. It really needs additional independent resources about Israel rather than authored by him. Also take a look at the ‘Cite’ menu on the edit screen for a template that lets you create good web references as bare links are not good. All the best.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 22:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean-Didier Vincent has been accepted[edit]

Jean-Didier Vincent, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Jean-Pierre Grünfeld[edit]

Hello, Postaire

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username North8000 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jean-Pierre Grünfeld, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Pierre Grünfeld.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:24, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Edgardo D. Carosella concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Edgardo D. Carosella, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roland Douce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INRA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Edgardo D. Carosella[edit]

Hello, Postaire. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edgardo D. Carosella".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:55, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anne Dejean-Assémat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Development.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]