Jump to content

User talk:Poweroffriendship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Poweroffriendship, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Poweroffriendship! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 8 December 2020 (UTC)


March 2022

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Philips into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:25, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! - FlightTime (open channel) 01:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hurontario LRT, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:14, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

[edit]

Hey Poweroffriendship, thanks for your recent work on 2024 CrowdStrike incident and other articles. Just wanted to give you a friendly heads up that "minor edit" on Wikipedia is generally meant to be used for purely superficial edits like fixing typos or reverting blatant vandalism. Any change to the underlying meaning of text is never minor, even if it's quite small.

This is one of those weird Wikipedia things that's often confusing for new editors; there's nothing wrong with the edits you made and I appreciate you for making them! Hope to see you around the project. Dylnuge (TalkEdits) 12:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]